From: foser <foser@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Session/.desktop WM compatibility, DM unification
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:27:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1143498427.22350.14.camel@rivendell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603272225.12500.danarmak@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1418 bytes --]
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 22:25 +0200, Dan Armak wrote:
> Assume the install prefix problem is fixed somehow. What items are displayed
> in each WM's menu?
>
> Option 1: KDE only displays KDE apps, Gnome only Gnome apps. How do we decide
> what is displayed in both ('neutral' apps)
> Can the user edit the menu, and
> include some things we don't include by default, in a WM-neutral way? What
> should WMs other than KDE and Gnome display by default?
>
> Option 2: always display everything. Problems: huge menu. KDE and Gnome and
> others use different categorization. A change of the status quo, so user
> community should get a chance to veto. And when using descriptions as primary
> menu text (e.g. 'Text editor' instead of 'kwrite'/'gedit') some KDE and Gnome
> programs have similar or identical descriptions, which looks bad to new
> users.
I'm aware of the issues surrounding menus, but the spec gives a lot of
options. As said, we haven't dealt with it, because it is not a snag
that we hit currently.
I think we can basically have several menu setups fit for different
tasks/DEs and either let loginmanagers choose on startup or users choose
on install.
I don't know what the future plans are of KDE regarding it's slotting,
but if it intends to use syswide (fdo) specs like mime/icons the install
alternate root is going to be the main hurdle to tackle.
- foser
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-27 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-26 22:03 [gentoo-dev] Session/.desktop WM compatibility, DM unification Dan Armak
2006-03-27 9:02 ` Paul de Vrieze
2006-03-27 14:55 ` foser
2006-03-27 15:01 ` Paul de Vrieze
2006-03-27 16:23 ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-03-27 20:25 ` Dan Armak
2006-03-27 22:27 ` foser [this message]
2006-03-29 17:45 ` Dan Armak
2006-03-28 5:04 ` Aron Griffis
2006-03-28 9:51 ` Jakub Moc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1143498427.22350.14.camel@rivendell \
--to=foser@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox