From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FLQxs-0008TD-9E for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:26:56 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5) with SMTP id k2KKQKbX031262; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:26:20 GMT Received: from smtp03.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k2KKOLiU012494 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:24:22 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp03.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id k2KKOUd7010350 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:24:30 -0500 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:20:36 -0500 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: package naming From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: References: <200603201742.24784.uberlord@gentoo.org> <200603201852.40510@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <441EED67.1030900@gentoo.org> <200603201829.02467.uberlord@gentoo.org> <1142881216.32640.14.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-/k8BSu6qvsABNyI+eNJr" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:20:35 -0500 Message-Id: <1142886036.32640.16.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 X-Archives-Salt: f763bcb2-c93f-455e-9ecc-b5bffbe32f51 X-Archives-Hash: cc782ad088bd63e3f9fb42c349cdde96 --=-/k8BSu6qvsABNyI+eNJr Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 12:37 -0700, Duncan wrote: > Agreed if keeping the old name with a gentoo prefix/suffix is chosen.=20 > However, nearly all Gentoo system tools are e (not only portage > related either, as there's eselect), so I'd suggest eresolv. He was referring to the *package* name. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-/k8BSu6qvsABNyI+eNJr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEHw6TkT4lNIS36YERAv1ZAKCU/HuYpWGAzwolzwPStlLtmgym5ACfQ9Zw 2KQnlI2gcJO1A1T6spiPXlk= =bAXE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-/k8BSu6qvsABNyI+eNJr-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list