From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FJcO9-0006lX-4R for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:14:33 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5) with SMTP id k2FKDnxG014118; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:13:49 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5.20060308/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k2FKBvkE006059 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:11:58 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1FJcLd-0002Pu-Au; Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:11:57 +0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] SLOTed MySQL or not? From: Jeremy Huddleston To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: vivo@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20060304112900.GD18469@saber.gentoo.org.ua> References: <44046DE0.7020209@gentoo.org> <44058560.3040503@gentoo.org> <20060304112900.GD18469@saber.gentoo.org.ua> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-X0edQXQM/yEcXYdnNAfa" Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:11:40 -0800 Message-Id: <1142453501.21152.3.camel@cloud.outersquare.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 X-Archives-Salt: d7dd2634-4eb2-4d8e-856f-9b77f91616b9 X-Archives-Hash: 57f1344b8ba736c405f4b2d841937876 --=-X0edQXQM/yEcXYdnNAfa Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > >Before to this to happen I'll try my best to close the greatest number > >of bugs still open (many already are but not committed) and manage to > >bring MySQL back to the unslotted version. > > > >[1] > >Yes. 12% [ 12 ] > >No. 75% [ 72 ] > >No preference. 11% [ 11 ] > > > I have one question: > Who answer NO on poll? Users don't always know what's right for themselves, and I'm sure a big percentage of these "nos" are because people don't want to go through the hassle of figuring out how to switch to slotted, not because it's a bad idea. This is a MUCH NEEDED feature and one I was extremely glad someone worked on. Don't get rid of it. I didn't even notice this thread until I noticed weirdness in my mysql upgrade from slotted back to unslotted. For gods sake, don't get rid of this feature just because a few users don't want to read some docs. --=-X0edQXQM/yEcXYdnNAfa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEGHT8OpjtAl+gMRURAh3rAJ9NotXxsjOByIIQkuwKkOxn9kPq+QCgmxg4 mxWu2HFQpr5NC1ye+R7ok/I= =DQg6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-X0edQXQM/yEcXYdnNAfa-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list