From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FEE4U-0000m5-Tr for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:15:59 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1SNDtvV000393; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:13:55 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1SN9S7T021255 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:09:28 GMT Received: from dslb-084-063-015-092.pools.arcor-ip.net ([84.63.15.92] helo=[10.0.0.13]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1FEDyl-00039v-Sk for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:10:04 +0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role From: Patrick Lauer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20060228225027.2ee9b34c@snowdrop.home> References: <20060227213321.7ee405ec@snowdrop.home> <200602281539.43661.vapier@gentoo.org> <905929917.20060228220239@gentoo.org> <200602281631.37594.vapier@gentoo.org> <20060228215040.GL11818@toucan.gentoo.org> <4404CB49.2080402@gentoo.org> <1141166554.7047.19.camel@localhost> <20060228225027.2ee9b34c@snowdrop.home> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-cxlx1h21HjD0eUXHeiYV" Organization: Gentoo Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:10:00 +0100 Message-Id: <1141168200.7376.0.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 X-Archives-Salt: 41e80855-082f-4f8e-851e-194db5562bad X-Archives-Hash: 3111f4a1e54cb5b4aaba73f6ec593495 --=-cxlx1h21HjD0eUXHeiYV Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 22:50 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:42:34 +0100 Patrick Lauer > wrote: > | ("We'll file bugs on Saturday if there are no objections to removal > | of mkdir in global scope") >=20 > Eek no. Have you any idea what happens when someone shoves an mkdir in > global scope? That one is most definitely on the list of "stuff that > gets fixed in any way, up to and including immediate cvs rm even if it > screws up deps for an arch" list. >=20 It seems that your sense of humor has gone missing ... --=20 Stand still, and let the rest of the universe move --=-cxlx1h21HjD0eUXHeiYV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEBNhHqER3hOUoZM4RAutzAJ9YOwf1lfiHwJiSHmw4jAL0FZahmgCffSIb k+7fTf8cKCp3qtauNsaDWms= =Knun -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-cxlx1h21HjD0eUXHeiYV-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list