From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
id 1FE6gS-0006q9-Sf
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:22:41 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1SFJUfJ031531;
Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:19:30 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1SFBY2m005079
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:11:34 GMT
Received: from dslb-084-063-028-160.pools.arcor-ip.net ([84.63.28.160] helo=[10.0.0.13])
by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54)
id 1FE6Wh-0008OV-7p
for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:12:35 +0000
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role
From: Patrick Lauer <patrick@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <20060228145246.67dee076@snowdrop.home>
References: <20060226222217.GB17257@aerie.halcy0n.com>
<1140997703.12229.166.camel@demandred.gnqs.org>
<20060227003413.GE17257@aerie.halcy0n.com>
<b38c6f4c0602270100k73226152pd7050252c654da9@mail.gmail.com>
<20060227170834.075e9388@snowdrop.home>
<1141071970.804.19.camel@demandred.gnqs.org>
<20060227203709.2a7bff47@snowdrop.home>
<1159375278.20060227214923@gentoo.org>
<20060227213321.7ee405ec@snowdrop.home>
<394439379.20060228103817@gentoo.org>
<20060228145246.67dee076@snowdrop.home>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-N3pB88YjZ3uliUwoRRqs"
Organization: Gentoo
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:12:32 +0100
Message-Id: <1141139552.2741.2.camel@localhost>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1
X-Archives-Salt: 76a4fe78-2290-405f-91ee-ed9b6cfcefe2
X-Archives-Hash: 07c740e24cc90907393c5133f8d053fb
--=-N3pB88YjZ3uliUwoRRqs
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 14:52 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:38:17 +0100 Jakub Moc <jakub@gentoo.org> wrote:
> | You still haven't posted posted a *single example* of webapp-config
> | brokeness. You, I'd say you should either back up claims about "all
> | the ways in which webapp-config is broken" or apologize to the
> | concerned developers for false claims.
>=20
> Fine. If posting a single way in which webapp-config is broken will
> make you happy, here you go:
>=20
> From webapp.eclass:
>=20
> function webapp_read_config ()
> {
>=20
> This is a whitespace / coding style breakage. The correct format should
> be:
>=20
> webapp_read_config() {
>=20
> Yes, it's an utterly trivial problem, but it is a QA violation. Getting
> a complete list is something that takes a heck of a lot longer, and I
> have yet to be convinced that my time would not be better spent
> elsewhere.
Wow. That is ... impressive. After about two days of asking for any real
bugs you are able to show a trivial syntax issue?
Please stop yelling "it si teh b0rk!" if you can't even list any serious
issues, and stop being rude to other people.
Thanks,
Patrick
--=20
Stand still, and let the rest of the universe move
--=-N3pB88YjZ3uliUwoRRqs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBEBGhgqER3hOUoZM4RAiMjAJ92Whq1gvXbTNSC+zaAKIHqU1KsyACfYD9G
IJ3IWKbfMGhJohXMxLwAcvg=
=6loJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-N3pB88YjZ3uliUwoRRqs--
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list