From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FDVku-0008MW-M0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:56:49 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1QNtdfW008909; Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:55:39 GMT Received: from mail.gnqs.org (myrddraal.demon.co.uk [62.49.28.63]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1QNpf1P001186 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:51:41 GMT Received: from [192.168.0.19] (helo=demandred.gnqs.org) by mail.gnqs.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FDVfx-0004Ue-Jd for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:51:41 +0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role From: Stuart Herbert To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <44023C9F.9050807@gentoo.org> References: <20060226222217.GB17257@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20060226231121.GB11930@dogmatix.willow.local> <20060226232147.37349bc2@snowdrop.home> <44023C9F.9050807@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ehuTcH15swQvd00wIpwP" Organization: Gentoo Linux Project Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:51:40 +0000 Message-Id: <1140997900.12387.170.camel@demandred.gnqs.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 X-Spam_score: -1.4 X-Spam_score_int: -13 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "demandred.gnqs.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 18:41 -0500, Alec Warner wrote: > While you may not think that soliciting comments is useful ( and in some > limited cases I would agree with you ) giving people the opportunity to > comment also means you just covered your ass, in terms of people going > "where the hell did that come from?" [...] Content analysis details: (-1.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP X-Archives-Salt: 6132d518-e495-441f-9dc7-8b74c96922c6 X-Archives-Hash: 5f94e67a260786a99f2a5ef58d7b4665 --=-ehuTcH15swQvd00wIpwP Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 18:41 -0500, Alec Warner wrote: > While you may not think that soliciting comments is useful ( and in some > limited cases I would agree with you ) giving people the opportunity to > comment also means you just covered your ass, in terms of people going > "where the hell did that come from?" It also means that the QA team has learned from the lessons of the past (ie devrel). Given Ciaran's personal and vocal history on those lessons, one would naturally assume that he'd jump at this chance to put his own previously stated views on how policy should be derived into practice :) Best regards, Stu --=20 Stuart Herbert stuart@gentoo.org Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ http://blog.stuartherbert.com/ GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint =3D 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C -- --=-ehuTcH15swQvd00wIpwP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEAj8LDC+AuvmvxXwRAl1/AJ9oIAN6jVZoyVcWh6P0mJr0mKUSRwCfb0md 58bGjKJS+ZOUxTjd7vN+dAk= =0dWz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ehuTcH15swQvd00wIpwP-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list