From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1FDVku-0008MW-M0
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:56:49 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1QNtdfW008909;
	Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:55:39 GMT
Received: from mail.gnqs.org (myrddraal.demon.co.uk [62.49.28.63])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1QNpf1P001186
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:51:41 GMT
Received: from [192.168.0.19] (helo=demandred.gnqs.org)
	by mail.gnqs.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1FDVfx-0004Ue-Jd
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:51:41 +0000
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role
From: Stuart Herbert <stuart@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <44023C9F.9050807@gentoo.org>
References: <20060226222217.GB17257@aerie.halcy0n.com>
	 <20060226231121.GB11930@dogmatix.willow.local>
	 <20060226232147.37349bc2@snowdrop.home>  <44023C9F.9050807@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ehuTcH15swQvd00wIpwP"
Organization: Gentoo Linux Project
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:51:40 +0000
Message-Id: <1140997900.12387.170.camel@demandred.gnqs.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 
X-Spam_score: -1.4
X-Spam_score_int: -13
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "demandred.gnqs.org", has
	identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
	has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.
	Content preview:  On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 18:41 -0500, Alec Warner wrote: >
	While you may not think that soliciting comments is useful ( and in some
	> limited cases I would agree with you ) giving people the opportunity
	to > comment also means you just covered your ass, in terms of people
	going > "where the hell did that come from?" [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (-1.4 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
	-1.4 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-Archives-Salt: 6132d518-e495-441f-9dc7-8b74c96922c6
X-Archives-Hash: 5f94e67a260786a99f2a5ef58d7b4665


--=-ehuTcH15swQvd00wIpwP
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 18:41 -0500, Alec Warner wrote:
> While you may not think that soliciting comments is useful ( and in some
> limited cases I would agree with you ) giving people the opportunity to
> comment also means you just covered your ass, in terms of people going
> "where the hell did that come from?"

It also means that the QA team has learned from the lessons of the past
(ie devrel).  Given Ciaran's personal and vocal history on those
lessons, one would naturally assume that he'd jump at this chance to put
his own previously stated views on how policy should be derived into
practice :)

Best regards,
Stu
--=20
Stuart Herbert                                         stuart@gentoo.org
Gentoo Developer                                  http://www.gentoo.org/
                                          http://blog.stuartherbert.com/

GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu
Key fingerprint =3D 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319  C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C
--


--=-ehuTcH15swQvd00wIpwP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBEAj8LDC+AuvmvxXwRAl1/AJ9oIAN6jVZoyVcWh6P0mJr0mKUSRwCfb0md
58bGjKJS+ZOUxTjd7vN+dAk=
=0dWz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-ehuTcH15swQvd00wIpwP--

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list