From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1F9gxW-0000J3-VQ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:06:03 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1GB56AU008297; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:05:06 GMT Received: from mails.dtic.mil (mails.dtic.mil [131.84.1.19]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1GB2mHq022209 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:02:49 GMT Received: from sys947.dtic.mil (sys947.dtic.mil [131.84.90.47]) by mails.dtic.mil (8.11.7p1+Sun/Oct04cac) with ESMTP id k1GB2jN23618 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:02:45 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bugzilla etiquette suggestions From: Michael Cummings To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: References: <43EFA485.4060709@gentoo.org> <20060212214340.GK30002@osgiliath.brixandersen.dk> <43EFC3BD.7080902@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-0V1wwJE3bbQS46hYN/Up" Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:02:44 -0500 Message-Id: <1140087765.13568.8.camel@sys947.dtic.mil> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 X-Archives-Salt: a663563c-1c04-4d08-99c5-bac073c70b4f X-Archives-Hash: eb4c9196f39505733f4d2ef094472912 --=-0V1wwJE3bbQS46hYN/Up Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 02:50 -0700, Duncan wrote: >=20 > What I'd do with such bugs is thank the user, but say next time, please > give me a few days, at least a week (or whatever a dev feels comfortable > with for that package, again, it'll vary) -- if it's /just/ a bump > request. If I take over a week (or whatever), then maybe I need > reminding, so let me know! OTOH, if the bug includes "I tried bumping th= e > last ebuild to use the new sources and it worked fine", or "... and it > broke at ", that's far more valuable than just a bump request, > and I'd treat it so. (In fact, that sounds like possible AT/HT material, > maybe ultimately leading to a new dev, to me.) bingo. a bug for bumping because their edges aren't bloody enough, bah, it'll get done just as soon as i can, but not before then, probably in the next week or so. now a version bump bug because it fixes an actual BUG, ping me, that i'll avoid coffee breaks (actually...that's not a good thing to do...) and sleep to get it in and working. I'm with this Duncan on this one (and someone said the way i couldn't manage in my other drafts :) ~mcummings --=-0V1wwJE3bbQS46hYN/Up Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBD9FvUq1ztTp5/Ti4RAo6aAJ9hvoIZ1Nsr/LjnEVa4Vv09ZzfiAQCfTADI ejnZC1hEMhlarFP7AN3dAyw= =PI+e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-0V1wwJE3bbQS46hYN/Up-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list