public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag - gs
@ 2006-01-09  9:26 Lares Moreau
  2006-01-10  2:58 ` Drake Wyrm
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lares Moreau @ 2006-01-09  9:26 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 592 bytes --]

media-gfx/graphicsmagick:gs - enable ghostscript support
media-gfx/imagemagick:gs - enable ghostscript support
media-libs/urt:gs - Add support for postscript

Looking in these ebuilds, all:
gs? ( virtual/ghostscript )

Please make global.
-- 
Lares Moreau <lares.moreau@gmail.com>  | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org
lares/irc.freenode.net                 |
Gentoo x86 Arch Tester                 |               ::0 Alberta, Canada
Public Key: 0D46BB6E @ subkeys.pgp.net |          Encrypted Mail Preferred
Key fingerprint = 0CA3 E40D F897 7709 3628  C5D4 7D94 483E 0D46 BB6E

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag - gs
  2006-01-09  9:26 [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag - gs Lares Moreau
@ 2006-01-10  2:58 ` Drake Wyrm
  2006-01-10  7:11   ` Lares Moreau
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Drake Wyrm @ 2006-01-10  2:58 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 746 bytes --]

Lares Moreau <lares.moreau@gmail.com> wrote:
> media-gfx/graphicsmagick:gs - enable ghostscript support
> media-gfx/imagemagick:gs - enable ghostscript support
> media-libs/urt:gs - Add support for postscript
> 
> Looking in these ebuilds, all:
> gs? ( virtual/ghostscript )

For how many of these might it make sense to use "ps - enable postscript
support" rather than "gs - enable ghostscript support"? If I understand
correctly, the consensus is that use flags should reflect the capability
enabled rather than the name of the library or package which provides
that capability.

-- 
That is not dead which can eternal lie,
And with strange eons even death may die.
  -- The Call of Cthulu, II. The Tale of Inspector Legrasse

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag - gs
  2006-01-10  2:58 ` Drake Wyrm
@ 2006-01-10  7:11   ` Lares Moreau
  2006-01-10 20:29     ` Mike Frysinger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lares Moreau @ 2006-01-10  7:11 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1625 bytes --]

On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 18:58 -0800, Drake Wyrm wrote:
> Lares Moreau <lares.moreau@gmail.com> wrote:
> > media-gfx/graphicsmagick:gs - enable ghostscript support
> > media-gfx/imagemagick:gs - enable ghostscript support
> > media-libs/urt:gs - Add support for postscript
> > 
> > Looking in these ebuilds, all:
> > gs? ( virtual/ghostscript )
> 
> For how many of these might it make sense to use "ps - enable postscript
> support" rather than "gs - enable ghostscript support"? If I understand
> correctly, the consensus is that use flags should reflect the capability
> enabled rather than the name of the library or package which provides
> that capability.

In doing some poking around and talking to a couple more devs, It seems
that the _unofficial_ consensus is that there be 5 or more packages that
use a particular flag before it is to move to global. There are
exception as always. Previously there has been great debate about where
the proverbial line is. Wherever the line, it must be posted to -dev
before the flag is committed to global.

And as for the flag reflecting the capability, you are absolutely
correct. The urt package seems to have mislabelled the entry in
use.local.desc.  

I'm just letting this global use die a quiet death.
-- 
Lares Moreau <lares.moreau@gmail.com>  | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org
lares/irc.freenode.net                 |
Gentoo x86 Arch Tester                 |               ::0 Alberta, Canada
Public Key: 0D46BB6E @ subkeys.pgp.net |          Encrypted Mail Preferred
Key fingerprint = 0CA3 E40D F897 7709 3628  C5D4 7D94 483E 0D46 BB6E

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag - gs
  2006-01-10  7:11   ` Lares Moreau
@ 2006-01-10 20:29     ` Mike Frysinger
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2006-01-10 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: Lares Moreau

On Tuesday 10 January 2006 02:11, Lares Moreau wrote:
> And as for the flag reflecting the capability, you are absolutely
> correct. The urt package seems to have mislabelled the entry in
> use.local.desc.

not really ... urt uses ghostscript to add postscript capabilities, i just 
called it 'gs' because that was what was already in use

> I'm just letting this global use die a quiet death.

i'd bring it up again when we have more packages using it
-mike
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-01-10 20:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-01-09  9:26 [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag - gs Lares Moreau
2006-01-10  2:58 ` Drake Wyrm
2006-01-10  7:11   ` Lares Moreau
2006-01-10 20:29     ` Mike Frysinger

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox