From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 19: Gentoo Stable Portage Tree -- ideas
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 13:57:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1136573843.18383.66.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43BE8C5B.4020804@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2096 bytes --]
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 09:27 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 02:36 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> >
> >>OTOH, it's entirely possible a Gentoo /based/ enterprise distribution may
> >>emerge at some point. IMO, however, there's enough conflict with what
> >>makes Gentoo great at what it does today, that such efforts should be
> >>separate from Gentoo itself.
> >
> >
> > I don't disagree with you entirely, but there's nothing stopping us from
> > *also* producing a "Gentoo Enterprise Linux" distribution.
> >
> > Like I said, I'll post my proposal, modified to fit the times, of
> > course, as soon as I get a chance (it'll take a while to write back up).
>
> As seen from the discussion earlier this week, I don't think Gentoo has
> the proper open-mindness to create a proper enterprise distro. There are
> too many things that would get in the way of Gentoo proper to make it
> work right. I agree with Duncan that the best route is an outside
> project so that they don't have the constraints of Gentoo proper. Trying
> to inflict the ideals of an enterprise distro into Gentoo right now will
> be an uphill battle the whole way. Just look at all the comments made
> from my thread earlier. You cannot make an enterprise distro without
> focus or direction and a leader. You'll be stuck in committee decisions
> all the time.
I agree with you. My point was that it could be done, still. Let me
get my proposal sent out and we'll see what people think. More than
likely, it'll be something along the lines of "great idea, now where do
we find the time/money/people/goats to do it" but we can always hope.
> Not saying its impossible, but it won't be easy.
Hopefully my proposal gives enough of a split to allow for a separate
"Enterprise" solution without alienating the current developers,
dramatically increasing their workload, or changing what Gentoo
currently is and isn't...
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
x86 Architecture Team
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-06 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-06 4:42 [gentoo-dev] GLEP 19: Gentoo Stable Portage Tree -- ideas Andrew Muraco
2006-01-06 4:52 ` Andrew Muraco
2006-01-06 5:29 ` Brian Harring
2006-01-06 5:35 ` Brian Harring
2006-01-06 9:00 ` Chris Bainbridge
2006-01-06 9:36 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2006-01-06 15:09 ` Chris Gianelloni
2006-01-06 15:27 ` Lance Albertson
2006-01-06 16:19 ` Carsten Lohrke
2006-01-06 18:59 ` Chris Gianelloni
2006-01-06 16:46 ` Grant Goodyear
2006-01-06 17:12 ` Grant Goodyear
2006-01-08 0:24 ` Stuart Herbert
2006-01-06 17:25 ` Brian Harring
2006-01-06 18:41 ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-01-06 18:57 ` Chris Gianelloni [this message]
2006-01-06 15:05 ` [gentoo-dev] " Chris Gianelloni
2006-01-06 17:39 ` Brian Harring
2006-01-06 19:30 ` Chris Gianelloni
2006-01-06 22:48 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2006-01-06 23:32 ` Lance Albertson
2006-01-08 14:14 ` Chris Gianelloni
2006-01-08 16:55 ` Lance Albertson
2006-01-08 17:19 ` Brian Harring
2006-01-08 17:26 ` Lance Albertson
2006-01-06 23:11 ` [gentoo-dev] " Olivier Crete
2006-01-08 14:12 ` Chris Gianelloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1136573843.18383.66.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net \
--to=wolf31o2@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox