From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EuYUa-0002Rr-3u for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 17:01:36 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k05H0IWi028388; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 17:00:18 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k05GvRAN012866 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 16:57:27 GMT Received: from dslb-084-063-048-227.pools.arcor-ip.net ([84.63.48.227] helo=[10.0.0.13]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1EuYQZ-0001hN-0V for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 16:57:27 +0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: regular project updates From: Patrick Lauer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20060105164112.18700183@snowdrop.home> References: <1136476815.20002.45.camel@localhost> <20060105162813.GA25581@gentoo.org> <20060105164112.18700183@snowdrop.home> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-lU8rzXYoIa+9FvOLru/0" Organization: Gentoo Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 17:57:25 +0100 Message-Id: <1136480245.20002.74.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 X-Archives-Salt: f60a2987-7265-444f-a3ff-003dd3004f05 X-Archives-Hash: 8d68b6e8af299c0c07cec41440a05d99 --=-lU8rzXYoIa+9FvOLru/0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2006-01-05 at 16:41 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 17:28:13 +0100 Grobian wrote: > | I'm thinking of quite dull news, so absolutely not meant to be a > | publication like GWN, but just thingis like some commits on the > | portage sources that say to fix/implement X, a discussion on project > | ML Y working on Z. >=20 > Would our users really like to read a lengthy discussion on the > intricacies of the changes made to versionator.eclass to improve > performance, or the way in which the ten zillion packages needed by > the new KDE/Gnome/Xorg release were keyworded for a particular arch, > or the design decisions made for vim-spell.eclass to avoid requiring > that our users have four gigs of RAM? I mean, it'd be pretty frickin' > boring... I think Fabian is targetting cross-dev communications there ... It'd be time-consuming but sounds interesting. There's lots of "unimportant" info, like ... say ... what fixes are in the new baselayout? Is gcc4 safe to use? ... Having all that in a central place (like planet.g.o, only moderated) might help - if there is enough support!=20 Patrick --=20 Stand still, and let the rest of the universe move --=-lU8rzXYoIa+9FvOLru/0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDvU/1qER3hOUoZM4RAv7PAJ47+XrDIcLtEcdlm4Y+vedYqSud6gCeLPvu nN4aQ3fONHfl3IvAHl80MMw= =0QJV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-lU8rzXYoIa+9FvOLru/0-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list