From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1Er0jz-0006cU-IP
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:22:52 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBQMLgnW020817;
	Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:21:42 GMT
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.197])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBQMJoft032308
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:19:51 GMT
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so1056318wri
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:19:50 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer;
        b=E4gOchdJBLKoJovHdzV8nqtTlg2v6DL1vJzJsiypdhf/S7wSFm5OjxUfS04GuewX8fpoMslsDCgHktbRG1JnNWDgl+hBVPpxEgfqiB6nmeqw2+eM5ttjna5nM0HE9S4GnHiIcdAhI/qyc7i282vLtMuSjhP/dxDFbdw1WUHlJOk=
Received: by 10.54.62.17 with SMTP id k17mr4464776wra;
        Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:19:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?176.16.10.30? ( [68.144.157.61])
        by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 12sm12610427wrl.2005.12.26.14.19.49;
        Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:19:50 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Stupid USE defaults that need cleaning
From: Lares Moreau <lares.moreau@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <1135622183.3203.27.camel@zelda.hyrule>
References: <43AF7B25.6060803@gentoo.org>
	 <20051226153533.695493e4@snowdrop.home>
	 <1962459692.20051226175717@gentoo.org>
	 <1135622183.3203.27.camel@zelda.hyrule>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-18oG3lkh2sXQgnXv96/Y"
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:19:47 -0700
Message-Id: <1135635587.7410.32.camel@localhost>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 
X-Archives-Salt: a6a340d0-6dae-4978-a3a6-6ab67a66b749
X-Archives-Hash: 2898dc6b86b050fbd6db9df606e717ee


--=-18oG3lkh2sXQgnXv96/Y
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 2005-12-26 at 12:36 -0600, Joe McCann wrote:
>=20
> For the record, the eds flag was
> added as a default flag because every 3rd gnome user would file bugs or
> complain via forums because they installed gnome, found no
> evolution-data-server integration, and then be bummed when they had to
> recompile packages again. This whole thread seems to have come from a
> misunderstanding of how use.defaults work and 20 min of boredom.
>=20

I'm relatively ignorant of USE Flag intricacies, so please forgive me if
things don't 'fit'.

Is it feasible and or useful to have a 'meta-flag' that that enables all
the 'necessary' USE flags for a given group of packages?  So something
like USE=3D'meta-<flagname>'.=20
This has the distinction of being a meta-flag, and as such nothing
really gets turned on 'behind the users back', advanced users can look
into it and see what is being enabled by it and USE=3D'-flag' for the
flags the users doesn't need/want, and expert users would just not use
it. This way meta packages like KDE and Gnome can have their own
meta-flag to do what the need with.

It also seems to me that more things will need to 'just work' as our
user-base becomes larger and, on average, less advanced. We could amend
the desktop guide to include something like USE=3D'meta-gnome' to the
gnome section. And similar to other meta-flags.

This may add an unnecessary level of complexity to the use flag system,
but also may be very useful.=20

--=20
Lares Moreau <lares.moreau@gmail.com>  | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org
lares/irc.freenode.net                 |
Gentoo x86 Arch Tester                 |               ::0 Alberta, Canada
Public Key: 0D46BB6E @ subkeys.pgp.net |          Encrypted Mail Preferred
Key fingerprint =3D 0CA3 E40D F897 7709 3628  C5D4 7D94 483E 0D46 BB6E

--=-18oG3lkh2sXQgnXv96/Y
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDsGyDfZRIPg1Gu24RAinuAJwIyIMBMbI0eomKEIvHoE48DHw3ewCePA1O
qVTWHMjW9j9yO3W57UeRAss=
=hqGc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-18oG3lkh2sXQgnXv96/Y--

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list