From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
id 1EprI6-0003Ng-Ic
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:05:19 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBNI3UZo016489;
Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:03:30 GMT
Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.203])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBNHw5x8023398
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:58:06 GMT
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z3so650735nzf
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:58:05 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer;
b=aO8usRRq7jzYIcorujtbiCHIwqrgRSBpXeaqFELutegFgG0czUoZRMcZvu+ZG1OTNQaw3srBu82JO2LUrIHADnhom0DVnLnQmLWa6rjdJe1FupyGDRGnL9xgM09lQQz0cdK0jyO25GTuc9jh2vrayTcR0tJUYPkHPf9q6EoqU3U=
Received: by 10.36.79.16 with SMTP id c16mr206271nzb;
Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:58:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?176.16.10.30? ( [68.144.157.61])
by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 40sm155204nzf.2005.12.23.09.58.04;
Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:58:04 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Optimizing performance
From: Lares Moreau <lares.moreau@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <43AC35AC.7040309@gentoo.org>
References: <1134650885.4634.57.camel@localhost>
<1134661396.4634.89.camel@localhost> <43A190B8.3070602@gentoo.org>
<200512231828.45902.pauldv@gentoo.org> <43AC35AC.7040309@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Tgn37eYrfwgr6szAXKl1"
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:58:02 -0700
Message-Id: <1135360682.7467.1.camel@localhost>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1
X-Archives-Salt: d9520796-dd0e-493e-8cbf-67385522147c
X-Archives-Hash: f76d90df46a505be23c0172ab51866a6
--=-Tgn37eYrfwgr6szAXKl1
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 09:36 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>=20
> Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> | On Thursday 15 December 2005 16:50, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> |>gentoo-performance Discussions about improving the performance of Gen=
too
> |>
> |>Although it was a bit quiet last time I was subscribed to it.
> |
> |
> | I still am. The last message is from last august. And that was about
> someone
> | wanting to unsubscribe the wrong way. The last proper message was from
> July
> | 4th.
>=20
> That clearly means everybody thinks Gentoo's performance is great and
> feels no need to discuss it. =3D)
It is discussed on gentoo-user. although many times with
less-then-practical solutions
-Lares
--=20
Lares Moreau <lares.moreau@gmail.com> | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org
lares/irc.freenode.net |
Gentoo x86 Arch Tester | ::0 Alberta, Canada
Public Key: 0D46BB6E @ subkeys.pgp.net | Encrypted Mail Preferred
Key fingerprint =3D 0CA3 E40D F897 7709 3628 C5D4 7D94 483E 0D46 BB6E
--=-Tgn37eYrfwgr6szAXKl1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDrDqpfZRIPg1Gu24RAhk0AKCIqHe2/XGE+muQLPBoh9i3kqtNngCgki8D
Wm/gpGG8oj5fWc2cIgpqiqs=
=JLHT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-Tgn37eYrfwgr6szAXKl1--
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list