From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Ep587-0007TT-R4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:39:48 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBLEccIp029377; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:38:38 GMT Received: from smtp03.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBLEXrSe004670 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:33:53 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp03.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id jBLEY3ua010188 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 09:34:03 -0500 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 21 Dec 2005 09:31:44 -0500 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20051221142631.GA19595@toucan.gentoo.org> References: <20051220143602.GC18141@toucan.gentoo.org> <1135169377.11036.2.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org> <20051221142631.GA19595@toucan.gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-xnpShvE49vH0hMTg44hf" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 09:31:43 -0500 Message-Id: <1135175504.31174.11.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 X-Archives-Salt: 6fdff8dd-3940-45a2-8640-7eecdc3ccd0e X-Archives-Hash: c1cb939115a1f51e053a660f89603719 --=-xnpShvE49vH0hMTg44hf Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 14:26 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 07:49:37AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate > > > (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to > > > it and post any feedback they have with it ? it should mostly be a > > > bugfix release over 1.11.13 since we arent doing any more real featur= es > > > for the 1.11.x branch ... > >=20 > > Does this preclude any bug fixes going into 1.11 that affect the > > release? I have at least two that I would love to get resolved before > > 2006.0's release >=20 > if you're referring to the multilib issue for amd64/ppc64, then no, > that is not in the ebuild yet ... talk to eradicator That's the one. Have the bug # for it? > > and waiting for the eventual stabilization of 1.12 > > isn't exactly the best plan for this. >=20 > and almost certainly wont happen, not to mention i'm pretty sure both > 1.11.x and 1.12.x are broken in the same regard --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-xnpShvE49vH0hMTg44hf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDqWdPkT4lNIS36YERAgyTAJ9xCAyDfO0D6eCLWPTjxLyZNS6IQQCgrAOH 9TOckUkjGT2GeF3kRivSkiE= =Qtkc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-xnpShvE49vH0hMTg44hf-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list