[gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

[gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

[Mike Frysinger]

since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate
(1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to
it and post any feedback they have with it ?  it should mostly be a
bugfix release over 1.11.13 since we arent doing any more real features
for the 1.11.x branch ...
-mike
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

[Jakub Moc]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 475 bytes --]


20.12.2005, 15:36:02, Mike Frysinger wrote:

> since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate
> (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to
> it and post any feedback they have with it ?  it should mostly be a
> bugfix release over 1.11.13 since we arent doing any more real features
> for the 1.11.x branch ...
> -mike

Using for over a week, fixed udev for me, did not break anything... Ship it!
:=)

-- 

jakub

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 183 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

[Paul Varner]

> since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate
> (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to
> it and post any feedback they have with it ?  it should mostly be a
> bugfix release over 1.11.13 since we arent doing any more real features
> for the 1.11.x branch ...

Looking good here on a stable x86 system.  The only thing that I noted
is that >=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.86-r3 will have to go stable at the same
time due to it being a dependency.

Regards,
Paul
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

[Chris Gianelloni]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1108 bytes --]

On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 12:15 -0600, Paul Varner wrote:
> > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate
> > (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to
> > it and post any feedback they have with it ?  it should mostly be a
> > bugfix release over 1.11.13 since we arent doing any more real features
> > for the 1.11.x branch ...
> 
> Looking good here on a stable x86 system.  The only thing that I noted
> is that >=sys-apps/sysvinit-2.86-r3 will have to go stable at the same
> time due to it being a dependency.

Well, vmware-workstation and vmare-player really need this version of
baselayout stable.  I had to remove the dependency from
vmware-workstation for the time being because of a security bug.  We are
getting very close to a final snapshot for 2006.0, so I'd really like to
see this get stabilized before then.  Right now we really need bug
#110143 fixed so we can have a stable version of 1.11.14 in the tree.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
x86 Architecture Team
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

[Matthias Langer]

On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate
> (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to
> it and post any feedback they have with it ?  it should mostly be a
> bugfix release over 1.11.13 since we arent doing any more real features
> for the 1.11.x branch ...
> -mike

Seems to work fine here ...

Portage 2.0.51.22-r3 (default-linux/x86/2005.1, gcc-3.4.4,
glibc-2.3.5-r2, 2.6.14.2 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.14.2 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+
Gentoo Base System version 1.6.14
dev-lang/python:     2.3.5-r2, 2.4.2
sys-apps/sandbox:    1.2.12
sys-devel/autoconf:  2.13, 2.59-r6
sys-devel/automake:  1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r1
sys-devel/binutils:  2.16.1
sys-devel/libtool:   1.5.20
virtual/os-headers:  2.6.11-r2
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon-xp -pipe"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3.4/env /usr/kde/3.4/share/config /usr/kde/3.4/shutdown /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/share/config /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=athlon-xp -pipe"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoconfig distlocks sandbox sfperms strict"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/opsys/linux/gentoo/ "
LANG="en_US.utf8"
LC_ALL="en_US.utf8"
LINGUAS="de en"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.europe.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="x86 3dnow 3dnowext X aalib alsa apm audiofile avi berkdb
bitmap-fonts bzip2 bzlib cdr crypt cups curl dbus dvd dvdr emboss encode
esd evo exif expat fam ffmpeg firefox foomaticdb fortran gd gdbm gif
glut gmp gnome gphoto2 gpm gstreamer gtk gtk2 guile hal idn imagemagick
imlib ipv6 java jpeg junit lcms libg++ libwww mad mikmod mmx mmxext mng
motif mp3 mpeg ncurses nls nsplugin nvidia ogg oggvorbis opengl oss pam
pcre pdflib perl plotutils png python readline recode ruby sdl slang
speex spell sqlite sse ssl svga tcltk tcpd tiff truetype truetype-fonts
type1-fonts udev unicode usb vorbis win32codecs xine xml xml2 xmms xv
xvid zlib linguas_de linguas_en userland_GNU kernel_linux elibc_glibc"
Unset:  ASFLAGS, CTARGET, LDFLAGS

Matthias


-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

[Chris Gianelloni]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 743 bytes --]

On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate
> (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to
> it and post any feedback they have with it ?  it should mostly be a
> bugfix release over 1.11.13 since we arent doing any more real features
> for the 1.11.x branch ...

Does this preclude any bug fixes going into 1.11 that affect the
release?  I have at least two that I would love to get resolved before
2006.0's release, and waiting for the eventual stabilization of 1.12
isn't exactly the best plan for this.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
x86 Architecture Team
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

[Roy Marples]

On Wednesday 21 December 2005 12:49, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate
> > (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to
> > it and post any feedback they have with it ?  it should mostly be a
> > bugfix release over 1.11.13 since we arent doing any more real features
> > for the 1.11.x branch ...
>
> Does this preclude any bug fixes going into 1.11 that affect the
> release?  I have at least two that I would love to get resolved before
> 2006.0's release, and waiting for the eventual stabilization of 1.12
> isn't exactly the best plan for this.

Got bug numbers?
-- 
Roy Marples <uberlord@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux Developer
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

[Chris Gianelloni]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1030 bytes --]

On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 13:13 +0000, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 December 2005 12:49, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate
> > > (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to
> > > it and post any feedback they have with it ?  it should mostly be a
> > > bugfix release over 1.11.13 since we arent doing any more real features
> > > for the 1.11.x branch ...
> >
> > Does this preclude any bug fixes going into 1.11 that affect the
> > release?  I have at least two that I would love to get resolved before
> > 2006.0's release, and waiting for the eventual stabilization of 1.12
> > isn't exactly the best plan for this.
> 
> Got bug numbers?

57229
99682

I know there's at least one more, but I cannot seem to locate it at this
moment.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
x86 Architecture Team
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

[Mike Frysinger]

On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 09:30:56AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 13:13 +0000, Roy Marples wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 December 2005 12:49, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate
> > > > (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to
> > > > it and post any feedback they have with it ?  it should mostly be a
> > > > bugfix release over 1.11.13 since we arent doing any more real features
> > > > for the 1.11.x branch ...
> > >
> > > Does this preclude any bug fixes going into 1.11 that affect the
> > > release?  I have at least two that I would love to get resolved before
> > > 2006.0's release, and waiting for the eventual stabilization of 1.12
> > > isn't exactly the best plan for this.
> > 
> > Got bug numbers?
> 
> 57229

not an issue with baselayout, lvm code has been moved to the lvm ebuild

> 99682

that bug is still waiting for feedback from you releng peeps :P
-mike
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

[Chris Gianelloni]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1432 bytes --]

On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 14:45 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 09:30:56AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 13:13 +0000, Roy Marples wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 21 December 2005 12:49, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate
> > > > > (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to
> > > > > it and post any feedback they have with it ?  it should mostly be a
> > > > > bugfix release over 1.11.13 since we arent doing any more real features
> > > > > for the 1.11.x branch ...
> > > >
> > > > Does this preclude any bug fixes going into 1.11 that affect the
> > > > release?  I have at least two that I would love to get resolved before
> > > > 2006.0's release, and waiting for the eventual stabilization of 1.12
> > > > isn't exactly the best plan for this.
> > > 
> > > Got bug numbers?
> > 
> > 57229
> 
> not an issue with baselayout, lvm code has been moved to the lvm ebuild

OK.

> > 99682
> 
> that bug is still waiting for feedback from you releng peeps :P

Ehh... what is needed from us?  I don't see anything asking us for more
information (and have commented as such on the bug).

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
x86 Architecture Team
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

[Mike Frysinger]

On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 07:49:37AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate
> > (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to
> > it and post any feedback they have with it ?  it should mostly be a
> > bugfix release over 1.11.13 since we arent doing any more real features
> > for the 1.11.x branch ...
> 
> Does this preclude any bug fixes going into 1.11 that affect the
> release?  I have at least two that I would love to get resolved before
> 2006.0's release

if you're referring to the multilib issue for amd64/ppc64, then no,
that is not in the ebuild yet ... talk to eradicator

> and waiting for the eventual stabilization of 1.12
> isn't exactly the best plan for this.

and almost certainly wont happen, not to mention i'm pretty sure both
1.11.x and 1.12.x are broken in the same regard
-mike
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

[Chris Gianelloni]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1222 bytes --]

On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 14:26 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 07:49:37AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 14:36 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate
> > > (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to
> > > it and post any feedback they have with it ?  it should mostly be a
> > > bugfix release over 1.11.13 since we arent doing any more real features
> > > for the 1.11.x branch ...
> > 
> > Does this preclude any bug fixes going into 1.11 that affect the
> > release?  I have at least two that I would love to get resolved before
> > 2006.0's release
> 
> if you're referring to the multilib issue for amd64/ppc64, then no,
> that is not in the ebuild yet ... talk to eradicator

That's the one.  Have the bug # for it?

> > and waiting for the eventual stabilization of 1.12
> > isn't exactly the best plan for this.
> 
> and almost certainly wont happen, not to mention i'm pretty sure both
> 1.11.x and 1.12.x are broken in the same regard

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
x86 Architecture Team
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

[Mike Frysinger]

On Tuesday 20 December 2005 09:36, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> since we have baselayout-1.12.x in ~arch, the new stable candidate
> (1.11.14) isnt getting much air time ... can people try upgrading to
> it and post any feedback they have with it ?  it should mostly be a
> bugfix release over 1.11.13 since we arent doing any more real features
> for the 1.11.x branch ...

ignoring the two releng issues (since that's a bug with both 1.11.13 and 
1.11.14), any last thoughts before i do this ?  i'll wait until sunday 
nite ;)
-mike
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.14 stabilization

[Markus Rothe]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 233 bytes --]

Mike Frysinger wrote:
> ignoring the two releng issues (since that's a bug with both 1.11.13 and 
> 1.11.14), any last thoughts before i do this ?  i'll wait until sunday 
> nite ;)
> -mike

Looks good here (PPC64)!

markus

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]