From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EoSu0-00042g-4X for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:50:40 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBJLnLVp012299; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:49:21 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBJLlERd020992 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:47:14 GMT Received: from dslb-084-063-004-155.pools.arcor-ip.net ([84.63.4.155] helo=[10.0.0.13]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1EoSqf-0006tM-NK for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:47:14 +0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Viability of other SCM/version control systems for big repo's From: Patrick Lauer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20051219212352.669a3007@snowdrop.home> References: <43A70D98.7070504@gentoo.org> <1135027076.28875.11.camel@localhost> <20051219212352.669a3007@snowdrop.home> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-pcZt4T4XG4W0DdtJw8t9" Organization: Gentoo Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:47:11 +0100 Message-Id: <1135028831.29212.8.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 X-Archives-Salt: b672f9a7-4611-42a6-9f92-567ba4d0e6ac X-Archives-Hash: c7f9b8e1af89f07cbb42e184843cd890 --=-pcZt4T4XG4W0DdtJw8t9 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 21:23 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:17:56 +0100 Patrick Lauer > wrote: > | I've only tried svn with the cvs2svn script. > | Importing with history took ~8h on a 500Mhz box (which surprised me > | because I had heard "it takes days"). Doing checkouts caused about the > | same load as cvs, but I have no data points on multi-user behaviour.=20 >=20 > The interesting part isn't really how long it takes to convert things > or how long it takes to do a checkout, since they're in effect one time > costs. Yes, but generating a "realistic" workload isn't trivial.If we had cvs logs to replay we might get some good data. > I'm guessing we have at least a hundred full tree updates and a > thousand commits for every full checkout... Provide us with a script to generate partial updates/commits and I think many people will just run it for fun ... Maybe the nice Infra dudes could provide cvs snapshots for testing? Patrick --=20 Stand still, and let the rest of the universe move --=-pcZt4T4XG4W0DdtJw8t9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDpypeqER3hOUoZM4RAqPHAJ4tcYdt+CKMpNA7BtEWImexV06+OACbBRf9 z9dqBsvtN2UTU5gdvNSQdjE= =6U3y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-pcZt4T4XG4W0DdtJw8t9-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list