From: Matthias Langer <mlangc@gmx.at>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] gcc-3.4 migration guide
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 21:26:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1133641565.9240.20.camel@sputnik886.ruz-net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200512031546.50683.jkt@gentoo.org>
Well done, i've allready switched completely to gcc-3.4 with my main box
by reemerging about 650 packages. However, i allready started doing so a
few days ago, so I didn't read the official migration guide before
starting. Now, as everything works fine i just read this guide to
compair it with my own experiences as more or less simple user.
There are two things i have to critisize:
1.) If you remove gcc-3.3* before emerge -e system you will be left
behind with a broken python and therefore emerge. Thus i think there
should be a big red box telling users about this.
2.) emerge -e world on a system with lot of packages will most likley
fail somewhere during the process for various reasons. Fixig the problem
(for example by unmerging the package which causes it) and restarting
the process is not an option, as this may cost you lot's of time. In my
case, emerge -e world stopped 3 times. To continiue without starting it
all again, i did
# emerge --resume -p > package.list
and then edited this file with vi so that
# emerge --oneshot --nodeps `cat package.list`
continued the process, leafing out the brocken package. The be honest, i
expected to find some freaky sed command to accomplish what i did with
vi (thanks to the makro recorder) in the gcc-3.4 migration guide.
Have a nice day !
Matthias
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-03 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-02 21:55 [gentoo-dev] GCC-3.4 will be marked stable in ~1 hour on x86 Mark Loeser
2005-12-03 0:36 ` Philip Webb
2005-12-03 12:47 ` [gentoo-dev] emerge -e question Was: " Duncan
2005-12-04 2:13 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-12-04 9:18 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2005-12-03 14:46 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jan Kundrát
2005-12-03 20:26 ` Matthias Langer [this message]
2005-12-03 20:08 ` [gentoo-dev] gcc-3.4 migration guide Marius Mauch
2005-12-03 20:31 ` Jan Kundrát
2005-12-04 1:16 ` Matthias Langer
2005-12-04 1:37 ` Luis F. Araujo
2005-12-04 16:11 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jeff Grossman
2005-12-03 21:04 ` [gentoo-dev] " Joshua Baergen
2005-12-04 1:28 ` Matthias Langer
2005-12-04 1:38 ` Luis F. Araujo
2005-12-04 1:46 ` Matthias Langer
2005-12-04 23:24 ` [gentoo-dev] GCC-3.4 will be marked stable in ~1 hour on x86 Georgi Georgiev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1133641565.9240.20.camel@sputnik886.ruz-net \
--to=mlangc@gmx.at \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox