From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EhZeh-0006t5-GW for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:38:23 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAULbgji023757; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:37:42 GMT Received: from mail01.emarketsouth.com (mail01.emarketsouth.com [208.247.233.6]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAULYr5n022946 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:34:53 GMT Received: (qmail 1477 invoked by uid 399); 30 Nov 2005 21:34:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO onyx) (64.192.54.4) by 208.247.233.6 with SMTP; 30 Nov 2005 21:34:16 -0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving GCC-3.4 to stable on x86 From: solar To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20051130185640.GA5891@aerie.halcy0n.com> References: <20051128142233.GA19195@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20051130185640.GA5891@aerie.halcy0n.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:34:48 -0500 Message-Id: <1133386488.3762.10.camel@onyx> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 8b19ce12-1d93-4e96-8288-e2d6ba1e4ab4 X-Archives-Hash: 0e3e9b1b1b3d24cfc6a7cd26d19340e5 On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 13:56 -0500, Mark Loeser wrote: > Mark Loeser said: > > Only thing I see > > as lacking is we might want to get a doc together on how to properly upgrade > > your toolchain so we don't get an influx of bugs from users that have a > > system half compiled with 3.3 and the other half with 3.4 so they get linking > > errors. > > Seems people read this to mean that I was going to write a doc, which I have > no intentions on doing. I believe adding "It is recommended that you `emerge > -e system && emerge -e world` after merging gcc-3.4" to the einfo at the end > of the gcc-3.4.4 install should be good enough. I'm not sure how other archs > handled the migration, but I haven't been able to find any docs online. > > So, let me know if marking it stable in the next day or two is completely > stupid and I should wait to announce this via the GWN or something, or if its > an alright move and people aren't going to stab me for marking it stable. einfo "$stuff" and mark it stable later today wins my vote. -- solar Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list