From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EhEpf-0005YW-3f for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:24:19 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jATNN7hU013025; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:23:07 GMT Received: from mail.gnqs.org (myrddraal.demon.co.uk [62.49.28.63]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jATNKCse003207 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:20:13 GMT Received: from mogheiden.gnqs.org ([192.168.0.20]) by mail.gnqs.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EhElb-0006hj-Nh for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:20:10 +0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] apache2 default for 2006.0 From: Stuart Herbert To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1132841777.19957.17.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org> References: <1132841777.19957.17.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Sd2ysEM4Z2UwL/+ZHddD" Organization: Gentoo Linux Project Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:19:22 +0000 Message-Id: <1133306362.8523.8.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "demandred.gnqs.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 09:16 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > I'd like to add the apache2 USE flag to 2006.0's profile. This would > not resolve bug #95140, but would keep users from hitting it by default. > With apache being such a popular package, having it fail from a default > stage3 installation reflects poorly on us all. If I haven't heard any > good objections by November 30th, I'll make the change. This will *not* > be retroactive to any previous release profiles. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 7.5 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.8 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts X-Archives-Salt: 42fb7d36-cc45-48dd-b457-6ae8cea67f95 X-Archives-Hash: 7d6ace985ea06298c25898a2bae75f75 --=-Sd2ysEM4Z2UwL/+ZHddD Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 09:16 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > I'd like to add the apache2 USE flag to 2006.0's profile. This would > not resolve bug #95140, but would keep users from hitting it by default. > With apache being such a popular package, having it fail from a default > stage3 installation reflects poorly on us all. If I haven't heard any > good objections by November 30th, I'll make the change. This will *not* > be retroactive to any previous release profiles. I must be missing something. How is adding the apache2 USE flag the right solution to this problem with users trying to install apache v1? Best regards, Stu --=20 Stuart Herbert stuart@gentoo.org Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/ GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint =3D 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C -- --=-Sd2ysEM4Z2UwL/+ZHddD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDjOH6DC+AuvmvxXwRAutfAJ9XsREnC2I1UFNhdezRadIiAcCkTgCfVmiT J+ONqbNVo++6lgc9kvivHtg= =Ed5I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Sd2ysEM4Z2UwL/+ZHddD-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list