From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eh9Rg-0003xM-Av for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:39:12 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jATHcR5I027557; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:38:27 GMT Received: from viefep12-int.chello.at (viefep12-int.chello.at [213.46.255.25]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jATHaZEr011299 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:36:35 GMT Received: from g-one ([213.47.65.203]) by viefep12-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id <20051129173633.IKSZ29777.viefep12-int.chello.at@g-one> for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:36:33 +0100 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving GCC-3.4 to stable on x86 From: Andreas Proschofsky To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20051129160414.GG20234@toucan.gentoo.org> References: <20051128142233.GA19195@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20051129023054.GA1350@toucan.gentoo.org> <20051129024014.GA24230@aerie.halcy0n.com> <200511290951.38136.greg_g@gentoo.org> <1133275834.13876.23.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20051129150343.GD20234@toucan.gentoo.org> <1133278935.13876.29.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <1133279532.13876.32.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20051129160414.GG20234@toucan.gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-2f9UnJbm/12lkbMxat5M" Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:37:07 +0100 Message-Id: <1133285827.5517.10.camel@g-one> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 X-Archives-Salt: 836d5407-9940-44e5-ada8-749520f3c063 X-Archives-Hash: d146b4b38d69ff5a1db59a21d1b9065a --=-2f9UnJbm/12lkbMxat5M Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 16:04 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:52:11AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > broken /usr/lib32/openoffice/program/gconfbe1.uno.so (requires > > libORBit-2.so.0 libgconf-2.so.4) >=20 > binary packages should never be in /usr/ >=20 > > Is /opt ignored? >=20 > yes, because our policy specifically says binary packages in /opt It's not that easy for every package. For instance openoffice and openoffice-bin need to got to the same location, cause OOo does a user install and this will break when changing between them (and all the settings / paths and so on). So either we would have both in /opt which then means that the source based OOo is ignored too, or we have them in /usr/lib which results in the ooo-bin annoyance. I would say the second one is less harmful. Btw, there is a long running bug about the revdep-rebuild, which also has a solution for this: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D32276 bye Andreas --=20 Andreas Proschofsky Gentoo Developer / OpenOffice.org --=-2f9UnJbm/12lkbMxat5M Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDjJHDauoogOee02MRAnTCAJ0Q1ua9c+Zz1Y+AQZgkqZlpSytbMgCfc1Wl spQ6IPLxvKxRH0pv4zoy9ZU= =RRRL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-2f9UnJbm/12lkbMxat5M-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list