From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eh8XH-0001RI-E5 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:40:55 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jATGeB1K026284; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:40:11 GMT Received: from pop06.mail.atl.earthlink.net (pop06.mail.atl.earthlink.net [207.69.200.40]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jATGcJNL025350 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:38:19 GMT Received: from h-69-3-48-166.dnvtco56.dynamic.covad.net ([69.3.48.166]) by pop06.mail.atl.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #10) id 1Eh8Uk-00014I-00 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:38:18 -0500 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving GCC-3.4 to stable on x86 From: Tres Melton To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <438C5CB1.5080700@gentoo.org> References: <20051128142233.GA19195@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20051129111814.GD29294@dmz.brixandersen.dk> <20051129132151.GA18947@aerie.halcy0n.com> <438C5CB1.5080700@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-cEIrd2Dy6x54BTArKIwN" Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:38:17 -0700 Message-Id: <1133282297.26819.66.camel@thor.tres.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 X-Archives-Salt: 35fbbfc2-87a3-4405-bbbb-5e91806cab00 X-Archives-Hash: 93d222dc6a7e8d9dfff07e1615372bbf --=-cEIrd2Dy6x54BTArKIwN Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 08:50 -0500, Curtis Napier wrote: > Doing it from the outset will save the forums and bugs a lot of stress=20 > and heartache that could have been easily avoided. Don't forget the #gentoo channel. I meant to comment on this about the stage 1/2 thing but never did. I'm not picking sides but if the forum mods and the channel ops were both notified explicitly of changes that *are* coming then we could help head off a bunch of bugs and user aggravation. I'm pretty active in most places Gentoo but the first I heard about the stage 1/2 removal was GWN. If you could drop an email to the forum-mods address (??) and ops@gentoo.org a few days or so before something gets to the users that would be great. > Just my 2 $DENOMINATION's My 2/100 $DENOMINATION's :) --=20 Tres Melton IRC & Gentoo: RiverRat --=-cEIrd2Dy6x54BTArKIwN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDjIP5Jd2MUIk4MAARAs+SAJ96gh4mkEXVmgjjsI8CQq9LgDVGpgCeJG3Q VRgHuooSu3rK1QrNqbXLsBU= =SdMa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-cEIrd2Dy6x54BTArKIwN-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list