From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eh7qu-0007Gn-60 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:57:08 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jATFuOk7031499; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:56:24 GMT Received: from smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jATFrXeW014759 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:53:34 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id jATFrmdc002811 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:53:49 -0500 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:52:12 -0500 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving GCC-3.4 to stable on x86 From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1133278935.13876.29.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> References: <20051128142233.GA19195@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20051129023054.GA1350@toucan.gentoo.org> <20051129024014.GA24230@aerie.halcy0n.com> <200511290951.38136.greg_g@gentoo.org> <1133275834.13876.23.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20051129150343.GD20234@toucan.gentoo.org> <1133278935.13876.29.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-EIS9uPERSWtRzTUzJt/K" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:52:11 -0500 Message-Id: <1133279532.13876.32.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 X-Archives-Salt: 757b0656-755d-4ba3-91d5-bf16f470cf76 X-Archives-Hash: b7487bedeeb2e935b49afd9f04feb9ff --=-EIS9uPERSWtRzTUzJt/K Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 10:42 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 15:03 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 09:50:34AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > > On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 09:51 +0100, Gregorio Guidi wrote: > > > > Every user _must_ be instructed to run > > > > 'revdep-rebuild --soname libstdc++.so.5', > > > > if a system contains things linking to libstdc++.so.5 and things li= nking to=20 > > > > libstdc++.so.6 I consider it horribly broken. > > >=20 > > > ...and when it tries to "recompile" openoffice-bin? doom3? > >=20 > > revdep-rebuild should ignore those packages >=20 > Just curious, but how? How does it know that doom3 isn't compiled from > source and should be ignored? broken /usr/lib32/openoffice/program/gconfbe1.uno.so (requires libORBit-2.so.0 libgconf-2.so.4) broken /usr/lib32/openoffice/program/gnome-set-default-application (requires libORBit-2.so.0 libORBitCosNaming-2.so.0 libbonobo-2.so.0 libbonobo-activation.so.4 libgconf-2.so.4 libgnomevfs-2.so.0) broken /usr/lib32/openoffice/program/libofficebean.so.1.1 (requires libjawt.so) broken /usr/lib32/openoffice/program/libvclplug_kde680li.so.1.1 (requires libkdecore.so.4 libkdeui.so.4 libqt-mt.so.3) broken /usr/lib32/openoffice/program/python-core-2.3.4/lib/lib-dynload/_bsd= db.so (requires libdb-3.1.so) broken /usr/lib32/openoffice/program/python-core-2.3.4/lib/lib-dynload/_tki= nter.so (requires libBLT24.so libtcl8.3.so libtk8.3.so) broken /usr/lib32/openoffice/program/python-core-2.3.4/lib/lib-dynload/bz2.= so (requires libbz2.so.0) broken /usr/lib32/openoffice/program/python-core-2.3.4/lib/lib-dynload/dbm.= so (requires libgdbm.so.2) broken /usr/lib32/openoffice/program/python-core-2.3.4/lib/lib-dynload/gdbm= .so (requires libgdbm.so.2) broken /usr/lib32/openoffice/program/python-core-2.3.4/lib/lib-dynload/mpz.= so (requires libgmp.so.3) broken /usr/lib32/openoffice/program/ucpgvfs1.uno.so (requires libgnomevfs-2.so.0) These are the packages that I would merge, in order: Calculating dependencies ...done! [ebuild R ] app-office/openoffice-bin-2.0.0 It most definitely does not recognize binary packages of any kind. Just to let you know, every successful revdep-rebuild followed by another also wants openoffice-bin again. Interestingly enough, it did *not* list any of the games I have installed on that machine that are in /opt. Is /opt ignored? --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-EIS9uPERSWtRzTUzJt/K Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDjHkrkT4lNIS36YERAit3AKCKx1KwS/w/+8DB8iKM+hRn+IijyACZAa/J ToY7o8rQSjndybTiVAF64p8= =sr2C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-EIS9uPERSWtRzTUzJt/K-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list