From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eh7eF-0000Go-Rr for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:44:04 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jATFh4TB003429; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:43:04 GMT Received: from smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jATFeS2c018787 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:40:29 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id jATFeiI7023048 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:40:45 -0500 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:39:08 -0500 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving GCC-3.4 to stable on x86 From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200511291501.42275.mike@gaima.co.uk> References: <20051128142233.GA19195@aerie.halcy0n.com> <200511291501.42275.mike@gaima.co.uk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-A1fWwFipWlfs0hB8gaVE" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:39:07 -0500 Message-Id: <1133278747.13876.26.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 X-Archives-Salt: 80d9d1ae-e285-4c3b-b9fd-ab4ad7265be1 X-Archives-Hash: 4b5481365872597101cec7e35b0edc77 --=-A1fWwFipWlfs0hB8gaVE Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 15:01 +0000, Mike Williams wrote: > On Monday 28 November 2005 14:22, Mark Loeser wrote: > > This is basically a heads-up email to everyone to say that we are proba= bly > > going to be moving gcc-3.4.4-r1 to stable on x86 very soon. If any of = the > > archs that have already done the move from having 3.3 stable to 3.4 cou= ld > > give us a heads up on what to expect, that would be great. Only thing = I > > see as lacking is we might want to get a doc together on how to properl= y > > upgrade your toolchain so we don't get an influx of bugs from users tha= t > > have a system half compiled with 3.3 and the other half with 3.4 so the= y > > get linking errors. >=20 > Shouldn't this be a profile thing? i.e. 200{4,5}.X stays at 3.3.X, 2006.X= -> go=20 > to 3.4.X Nope. While it would be possible to limit it to a specific profile, it really makes it a pain in the ass, especially for two versions that are almost compatible, as opposed to the profiles that we have done in the past where we were going from things like gcc2 to gcc3, that were not very compatible, at all. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-A1fWwFipWlfs0hB8gaVE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDjHYbkT4lNIS36YERAibxAJ98OgiL42NR5GZU8YmX3SwAUDQE3wCgxBXj k/jQJqG4fkiqjo0YF33e9T4= =drf8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-A1fWwFipWlfs0hB8gaVE-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list