From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eh6ut-0004mY-9R for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:57:11 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jATEtAT0030334; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:55:10 GMT Received: from smtp05.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jATEpraV023151 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:51:54 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp05.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id jATEqR4T007499 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:52:27 -0500 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:50:35 -0500 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving GCC-3.4 to stable on x86 From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200511290951.38136.greg_g@gentoo.org> References: <20051128142233.GA19195@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20051129023054.GA1350@toucan.gentoo.org> <20051129024014.GA24230@aerie.halcy0n.com> <200511290951.38136.greg_g@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-5WxdoPsj/xPD9BX945wC" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:50:34 -0500 Message-Id: <1133275834.13876.23.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 X-Archives-Salt: 355bdf46-6669-491f-a55d-d48d28fa293b X-Archives-Hash: 86bfd3a8ce2667a7006f9b94368cbda4 --=-5WxdoPsj/xPD9BX945wC Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 09:51 +0100, Gregorio Guidi wrote: > On Tuesday 29 November 2005 03:40, Mark Loeser wrote: > > Mike Frysinger said: > > > that means when people upgrade to gcc-3.4, gcc-3.3 will remain on the= ir > > > system until they remove it > > > > > > so if user fails to rebuild all their packages before unmerging gcc-3= .3 > > > they will be screwed, but OH WELL > > > > Yea. Even after they remove it though, libstdc++-v3 should be pulled i= n > > after that. Only issue I really see is people that have libraries comp= iled > > with 3.3 and 3.4 and don't know why stuff is broken. I don't know how > > large of a problem that will be though. >=20 > It will be huge, see > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D64615 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D61146 >=20 > Every user _must_ be instructed to run > 'revdep-rebuild --soname libstdc++.so.5', > if a system contains things linking to libstdc++.so.5 and things linking = to=20 > libstdc++.so.6 I consider it horribly broken. *sigh* ...and when it tries to "recompile" openoffice-bin? doom3? A system linked against both libraries is definitely *not* broken, as there are plenty of cases where this is necessary. > Thus having libstdc++-v3 installed apparently solves a problem but in fac= t=20 > does not solve anything, the only solution is to recompile everything c++= =20 > related on the system. Except the binary apps that you don't have the source to be able to recompile. So now we're right back where we were, aren't we? --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-5WxdoPsj/xPD9BX945wC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDjGq6kT4lNIS36YERAlDdAJ0XCxcpbscrFv/19GxcwOBnDpRkWwCgn5re ZSG5mn8yGF/DLgsB1WdAAwM= =rpLF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-5WxdoPsj/xPD9BX945wC-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list