From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ego6K-0002e6-Hk for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:51:45 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jASIoa2w026088; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:50:36 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jASIl0kY021618 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:47:01 GMT Received: from dslb-084-063-023-107.pools.arcor-ip.net ([84.63.23.107] helo=[10.0.0.13]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1Ego1k-0004Hw-4s for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:47:00 +0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Misquoted in the GWN From: Patrick Lauer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20051128175430.0ebd4f4b@snowdrop.home> References: <20051128094800.GA32340@dmz.brixandersen.dk> <20051128175430.0ebd4f4b@snowdrop.home> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-N6zpPqG39VC5cLKAjtHF" Organization: Gentoo Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 19:46:57 +0100 Message-Id: <1133203617.24689.5.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 X-Archives-Salt: 873c8a71-648e-4b5b-8cfd-875032d459a9 X-Archives-Hash: 54996db5335134752594fc4b0bdbc243 --=-N6zpPqG39VC5cLKAjtHF Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 17:54 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:48:01 +0100 Henrik Brix Andersen > wrote: > | A friend of mine just alerted me to the fact, that I am featured in > | this weeks Gentoo Weekly News. Odd, I thought, noone had asked me > | anything regarding the GWN... >=20 > Not the first time this has happened... Not the first time that people whine. Meh. > | I suggest that in the future, all developers who are directly quoted > | in the GWN are contacted prior to posting the quotes. I realize that > | this will put a bit more work load on the GWN authors, but it should > | be as simple as sending a mail with the relevant section quoted for > | the developer to accept. >=20 > Also, why not bring back the "post to -core" requirement? Make it a > rule that it can't be labelled as an official Gentoo publication unless > it gets some review... Why not bring back the "the GWN is a community thing and YOU can also contr= ibute!!!" mentality? That Ulrich and I have made some suboptimal decisions in the past is a fact, but why aren't there more contributors to the GWN so that we two aren't single points of failure? /me returns to lurking in some dark caves --=20 Stand still, and let the rest of the universe move --=-N6zpPqG39VC5cLKAjtHF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDi1ChqER3hOUoZM4RAlyCAJ0WSpXdQmtp3UkeXoyXjF/iFFO4wACaA381 9sUzPX4Nd6LEC5feEQ1TOEI= =i/BM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-N6zpPqG39VC5cLKAjtHF-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list