public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Spider (D.m.D. Lj.)" <spider@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult or not?)
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 23:35:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1133130952.8007.3.camel@Darkmere.darkmere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1133027430.5317.307.camel@localhost>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1865 bytes --]

On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 12:50 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
> Good afternoon,
> 
> probably in portage-2.0.54 a patch will be added to emit split debug
> info. Having a split debug allows us to retain all the advantages of
> stripping executables while gaining the ability to properly debug
> executables in bfd aware programs. It's been in testing with a small
> hand full of devs and works quite well, but before it's pushed in we
> would like to get input from our devs & users.
> 
> Would you be willing to give up space in $ROOT/usr/lib/debug for ELF
> executables by default in order to aid in better debugging by or do we
> want to only emit it when a FEATURE= is defined.
> 
> Having a split debug pretty much obsoletes the need to add nostrip to
> your features in order to get debug info.
> 
> Users wishing to not have debug info can simply add
> INSTALL_MASK="/usr/lib/debug ${INSTALL_MASK}" to make.conf or the
> environment unless we make it FEATURE based.
> 
> I'm in favor of it enabled per default but I'd like to know what you
> think and why. (advantages of on/off by default etc..)
> 
> Anybody wanting to test or make use of this feature right away can grab
> a copy of my prepstrip from
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/portage_misc/prepstrip and save it to
> /usr/lib/portage/bin/prepstrip or patch portage with
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/patch_overlay/sys-apps/portage/portage-2.0.53_rc7-prepstrip.patch
> It requires you merge pax-utils for the scanelf util.
> 


I would certainly like this as on by default, and controlled via
INSTALL_MASK rather than a FEATURE.



(Although I'd have to rebuild my complete system, since I do have it all
with debug-symbols enabled ;)

//Spider

-- 
begin  .signature
Tortured users / Laughing in pain
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-11-27 22:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-26 17:50 [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult or not?) Ned Ludd
2005-11-26 18:30 ` Bruno
2005-11-26 18:55   ` [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (default " Ned Ludd
2005-11-27  9:53     ` Kevin F. Quinn
2005-11-27 12:18       ` Ned Ludd
2005-11-26 19:15 ` [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult " Olivier Crête
2005-11-26 19:20 ` [gentoo-dev] " R Hill
2005-11-27 12:24   ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Split ELF Debug (default " Ned Ludd
2005-11-27 13:09     ` Ivan Yosifov
2005-11-27 13:32       ` Edward Catmur
2005-11-27 13:40       ` Ned Ludd
2005-11-27 15:22         ` Edward Catmur
2005-11-27 15:44           ` Ned Ludd
2005-11-27 16:55             ` Ned Ludd
2005-11-27 21:01               ` Ivan Yosifov
2005-11-27 22:24                 ` Ned Ludd
2005-11-28 11:00                 ` Paul de Vrieze
2005-11-27 18:03         ` Mark Loeser
2005-11-27 19:51           ` Olivier Crête
2005-11-26 19:22 ` [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult " Ivan Yosifov
2005-11-26 20:01 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-11-26 21:42 ` Petteri Räty
2005-11-27  0:48   ` Dan Meltzer
2005-11-27  0:53     ` Mart Raudsepp
2005-11-27 12:23   ` [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (default " Ned Ludd
2005-11-26 23:10 ` [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult " Luca Barbato
2005-11-27 12:54   ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-11-27 14:39     ` Dan Meltzer
2005-11-27 14:49       ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-11-27 14:50       ` Ned Ludd
2005-11-27 15:31       ` Edward Catmur
2005-11-28  1:18     ` Georgi Georgiev
2005-11-28  4:21       ` Edward Catmur
2005-11-27 15:04 ` Tavis Ormandy
2005-11-27 15:30   ` Dan Meltzer
2005-11-28 11:14     ` Paul de Vrieze
2005-11-27 22:35 ` Spider (D.m.D. Lj.) [this message]
2005-11-28 10:51 ` Paul de Vrieze

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1133130952.8007.3.camel@Darkmere.darkmere \
    --to=spider@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox