From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EgTha-0007sG-UZ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 21:04:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jARL47Ax031448; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 21:04:07 GMT Received: from home.yosifov.net (mail.yosifov.net [193.200.14.114]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jARL1jGT011645 for ; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 21:02:09 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by home.yosifov.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0D42300EDF for ; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 23:01:28 +0200 (EET) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split ELF Debug (default or not?) From: Ivan Yosifov To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1133110523.5317.483.camel@localhost> References: <1133027430.5317.307.camel@localhost> <1133094251.5422.356.camel@localhost> <1133096987.26860.5.camel@home.yosifov.net> <1133098829.5422.409.camel@localhost> <1133104957.15135.22.camel@capella.catmur.co.uk> <1133106270.5422.451.camel@localhost> <1133110523.5317.483.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 23:01:27 +0200 Message-Id: <1133125287.7388.4.camel@home.yosifov.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a147ebbc-8c32-4480-942a-2c9b1435e797 X-Archives-Hash: 91a8a338778f42883baa537150034da5 On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 11:55 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote: > On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 10:44 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 15:22 +0000, Edward Catmur wrote: > > > On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 08:40 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 15:09 +0200, Ivan Yosifov wrote: > > > > > And one more thing. For proper debugging, don't I need the source to be > > > > > present ? > > > > > > > > -g3 -ggdb embeds the source code in the debug info so I don't see the > > > > point. > > > > > > It doesn't; at least not with gcc 3.4.4. It does embed function > > > prototypes and macro definitions, though. > > > > > > Ed Catmur > > > > Eh? > > > Never mind you were right Ed. taviso pointed out that dwarf2 doesnt > support embedding the actual source. I was seeing the source due to me > not having deleted the source. > > Guess that is where the debugedit thing of Tester's would come in handy > on glibc hosts. What is this debugedit thing for us non-devs ? IMO portage should have some way to keep the sources around for debugging, for the patch you are proposing to be fully useful. -- Cheers, Ivan Yosifov. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list