From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EgQ1s-0005Ox-CA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 17:09:32 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jARH8OTo017321; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 17:08:24 GMT Received: from skinny.southernlinux.net (ns2.rednecks.net [64.192.52.5]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jARH5Vc8030512 for ; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 17:05:32 GMT Received: (qmail 17056 invoked by uid 210); 27 Nov 2005 11:58:38 -0500 Received: from 64.192.53.57 by skinny (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.82/1195. f-prot: 4.4.2/3.14.11. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(64.192.53.57):. Processed in 0.062783 secs); 27 Nov 2005 16:58:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO montgomery-57.epproach.net) (64.192.53.57) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Nov 2005 11:58:37 -0500 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Are there valid uses for repoman --ignore-other-arches? From: Ned Ludd To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <4389DA15.2000707@gentoo.org> References: <4389DA15.2000707@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 12:05:29 -0500 Message-Id: <1133111129.5422.485.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id jARH8OVS017321 X-Archives-Salt: 6bb7569a-610a-45d3-bdbb-22d1eb7adb07 X-Archives-Hash: f944774519564a35d1784909b752edc2 On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 18:08 +0200, Petteri R=E4ty wrote: > --ignore-other-arches Instructs repoman to ignore arches that are not > relevent to the committing arch. REPORT/FIX issues you work around. >=20 > Are there any valid uses for this switch or can it be deprecated? From = a > QA point of view this seems like a very bad option. Unless we get proper arch teams for the less used arches like m68k the=20 switch will probably need to exist for a very long time. --=20 Ned Ludd Gentoo Linux --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list