public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-dev] Are there valid uses for repoman --ignore-other-arches?
@ 2005-11-27 16:08 Petteri Räty
  2005-11-27 16:53 ` Mike Frysinger
  2005-11-27 17:05 ` Ned Ludd
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Petteri Räty @ 2005-11-27 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 283 bytes --]

 --ignore-other-arches Instructs repoman to ignore arches that are not
relevent to the committing arch. REPORT/FIX issues you work around.

Are there any valid uses for this switch or can it be deprecated? From a
QA point of view this seems like a very bad option.

Regards,
Petteri

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] Are there valid uses for repoman --ignore-other-arches?
  2005-11-27 16:08 [gentoo-dev] Are there valid uses for repoman --ignore-other-arches? Petteri Räty
@ 2005-11-27 16:53 ` Mike Frysinger
  2005-11-27 17:05 ` Ned Ludd
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2005-11-27 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 06:08:53PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
>  --ignore-other-arches Instructs repoman to ignore arches that are not
> relevent to the committing arch. REPORT/FIX issues you work around.
> 
> Are there any valid uses for this switch or can it be deprecated? From a
> QA point of view this seems like a very bad option.

uhh yeah, like people who want to commit a fix unrelated to any arch
breakage someone else may have caused

arch breakage is for arch teams to worry over ... without the -I
option, maintainers are basically fucked and unable to commit any fixes
until the arch issue is resolved

and in case i wasnt clear, i'd be very against removing this
-mike
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] Are there valid uses for repoman --ignore-other-arches?
  2005-11-27 16:08 [gentoo-dev] Are there valid uses for repoman --ignore-other-arches? Petteri Räty
  2005-11-27 16:53 ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2005-11-27 17:05 ` Ned Ludd
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ned Ludd @ 2005-11-27 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 18:08 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
>  --ignore-other-arches Instructs repoman to ignore arches that are not
> relevent to the committing arch. REPORT/FIX issues you work around.
> 
> Are there any valid uses for this switch or can it be deprecated? From a
> QA point of view this seems like a very bad option.

Unless we get proper arch teams for the less used arches like m68k the 
switch will probably need to exist for a very long time.

-- 
Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-27 17:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-27 16:08 [gentoo-dev] Are there valid uses for repoman --ignore-other-arches? Petteri Räty
2005-11-27 16:53 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-11-27 17:05 ` Ned Ludd

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox