* [gentoo-dev] Are there valid uses for repoman --ignore-other-arches?
@ 2005-11-27 16:08 Petteri Räty
2005-11-27 16:53 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-11-27 17:05 ` Ned Ludd
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Petteri Räty @ 2005-11-27 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 283 bytes --]
--ignore-other-arches Instructs repoman to ignore arches that are not
relevent to the committing arch. REPORT/FIX issues you work around.
Are there any valid uses for this switch or can it be deprecated? From a
QA point of view this seems like a very bad option.
Regards,
Petteri
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Are there valid uses for repoman --ignore-other-arches?
2005-11-27 16:08 [gentoo-dev] Are there valid uses for repoman --ignore-other-arches? Petteri Räty
@ 2005-11-27 16:53 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-11-27 17:05 ` Ned Ludd
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2005-11-27 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 06:08:53PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
> --ignore-other-arches Instructs repoman to ignore arches that are not
> relevent to the committing arch. REPORT/FIX issues you work around.
>
> Are there any valid uses for this switch or can it be deprecated? From a
> QA point of view this seems like a very bad option.
uhh yeah, like people who want to commit a fix unrelated to any arch
breakage someone else may have caused
arch breakage is for arch teams to worry over ... without the -I
option, maintainers are basically fucked and unable to commit any fixes
until the arch issue is resolved
and in case i wasnt clear, i'd be very against removing this
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Are there valid uses for repoman --ignore-other-arches?
2005-11-27 16:08 [gentoo-dev] Are there valid uses for repoman --ignore-other-arches? Petteri Räty
2005-11-27 16:53 ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2005-11-27 17:05 ` Ned Ludd
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ned Ludd @ 2005-11-27 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 18:08 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> --ignore-other-arches Instructs repoman to ignore arches that are not
> relevent to the committing arch. REPORT/FIX issues you work around.
>
> Are there any valid uses for this switch or can it be deprecated? From a
> QA point of view this seems like a very bad option.
Unless we get proper arch teams for the less used arches like m68k the
switch will probably need to exist for a very long time.
--
Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-27 17:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-27 16:08 [gentoo-dev] Are there valid uses for repoman --ignore-other-arches? Petteri Räty
2005-11-27 16:53 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-11-27 17:05 ` Ned Ludd
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox