From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EgPrF-0005m4-Bd
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 16:58:33 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jARGvoHc009653;
	Sun, 27 Nov 2005 16:57:50 GMT
Received: from skinny.southernlinux.net (ns2.rednecks.net [64.192.52.5])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jARGtOVT012267
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 16:55:25 GMT
Received: (qmail 12179 invoked by uid 210); 27 Nov 2005 11:48:31 -0500
Received: from 64.192.53.57 by skinny (envelope-from <solar@gentoo.org>, uid 201) with qmail-scanner-1.25st 
 (clamdscan: 0.82/1195. f-prot: 4.4.2/3.14.11. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.25st.  
 Clear:RC:1(64.192.53.57):. 
 Processed in 0.058803 secs); 27 Nov 2005 16:48:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO montgomery-57.epproach.net) (64.192.53.57)
  by 0 with SMTP; 27 Nov 2005 11:48:31 -0500
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev]  Re: Split ELF Debug (default or not?)
From: Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <1133106270.5422.451.camel@localhost>
References:  <1133027430.5317.307.camel@localhost>
	 <dmach6$lh8$1@sea.gmane.org>  <1133094251.5422.356.camel@localhost>
	 <1133096987.26860.5.camel@home.yosifov.net>
	 <1133098829.5422.409.camel@localhost>
	 <1133104957.15135.22.camel@capella.catmur.co.uk>
	 <1133106270.5422.451.camel@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Gentoo Linux
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 11:55:23 -0500
Message-Id: <1133110523.5317.483.camel@localhost>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 2ee8d5ff-579e-4aad-b23d-25ae99549e87
X-Archives-Hash: 1b089a7e75bc7d39e050e2bc19c33253

On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 10:44 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 15:22 +0000, Edward Catmur wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 08:40 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 15:09 +0200, Ivan Yosifov wrote:
> > > > And one more thing. For proper debugging, don't I need the source to be
> > > > present ?
> > > 
> > > -g3 -ggdb embeds the source code in the debug info so I don't see the 
> > > point.
> > 
> > It doesn't; at least not with gcc 3.4.4. It does embed function
> > prototypes and macro definitions, though.
> > 
> > Ed Catmur
> 
> Eh? 


Never mind you were right Ed. taviso pointed out that dwarf2 doesnt 
support embedding the actual source. I was seeing the source due to me 
not having deleted the source.

Guess that is where the debugedit thing of Tester's would come in handy 
on glibc hosts.


-- 
Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list