From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EgNwP-0001J9-6c for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 14:55:45 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAREsWgS018292; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 14:54:32 GMT Received: from skinny.southernlinux.net (ns2.rednecks.net [64.192.52.5]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAREoMXY022490 for ; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 14:50:23 GMT Received: (qmail 1146 invoked by uid 210); 27 Nov 2005 09:43:29 -0500 Received: from 64.192.53.57 by skinny (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.82/1195. f-prot: 4.4.2/3.14.11. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(64.192.53.57):. Processed in 0.058903 secs); 27 Nov 2005 14:43:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO montgomery-57.epproach.net) (64.192.53.57) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Nov 2005 09:43:29 -0500 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult or not?) From: Ned Ludd To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <46059ce10511270639sd5540d9l75c6391082597cde@mail.gmail.com> References: <1133027430.5317.307.camel@localhost> <4388EB4F.6060508@gentoo.org> <200511271354.33574@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <46059ce10511270639sd5540d9l75c6391082597cde@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 09:50:21 -0500 Message-Id: <1133103021.21175.431.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id jAREsWi6018292 X-Archives-Salt: 6529f967-27b0-418b-b000-9e6297289cea X-Archives-Hash: 0d910c4cfe5288c0933272242ed02d94 On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 09:39 -0500, Dan Meltzer wrote: > On 11/27/05, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten=F2 wrote: > > On Sunday 27 November 2005 00:10, Luca Barbato wrote: > > > It's great! > > > Make it a FEATURE default on for common profiles. > > +1, and it would be better if the FEATURES, instead of removing the g= enerated > > files, would disable the building of them completely, mainly because = "work" > > systems with limited CPU, RAM and HDD space would probably prefer not= having > > to create and store them :) >=20 > Err, maybe I am incorrect, but isn't it more "work" to ungenerate them > (using strip) then to just not install them? it's pretty easy to add a check to the save_elf_debug function to tell=20 it to return if we decide that FEATURES=3Dsplitdebug will be the default=20 and that if it's not set to simply return from the function without=20 doing anything. --=20 Ned Ludd Gentoo Linux --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list