From: Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (default or not?)
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 07:23:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1133094231.5422.354.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4388D6CE.3090001@gentoo.org>
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 23:42 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Ned Ludd wrote:
> > Good afternoon,
> >
> > Would you be willing to give up space in $ROOT/usr/lib/debug for ELF
> > executables by default in order to aid in better debugging by or do we
> > want to only emit it when a FEATURE= is defined.
> >
> > Having a split debug pretty much obsoletes the need to add nostrip to
> > your features in order to get debug info.
> >
> > Users wishing to not have debug info can simply add
> > INSTALL_MASK="/usr/lib/debug ${INSTALL_MASK}" to make.conf or the
> > environment unless we make it FEATURE based.
> >
> > I'm in favor of it enabled per default but I'd like to know what you
> > think and why. (advantages of on/off by default etc..)
> >
>
> How useful is this debug information with -fomit-frame-pointer? From
> what I have read it makes debugging at least harder. I think most people
> have -fomit-frame-pointer in their CFLAGS so it should not be enabled by
> default if the debug info is not very useful any way.
>
> Regards,
> Petteri
-fomit-frame-pointer does indeed make certain aspects of debugging
harder but it does not moot the idea entirely.
--
Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-27 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-26 17:50 [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult or not?) Ned Ludd
2005-11-26 18:30 ` Bruno
2005-11-26 18:55 ` [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (default " Ned Ludd
2005-11-27 9:53 ` Kevin F. Quinn
2005-11-27 12:18 ` Ned Ludd
2005-11-26 19:15 ` [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult " Olivier Crête
2005-11-26 19:20 ` [gentoo-dev] " R Hill
2005-11-27 12:24 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Split ELF Debug (default " Ned Ludd
2005-11-27 13:09 ` Ivan Yosifov
2005-11-27 13:32 ` Edward Catmur
2005-11-27 13:40 ` Ned Ludd
2005-11-27 15:22 ` Edward Catmur
2005-11-27 15:44 ` Ned Ludd
2005-11-27 16:55 ` Ned Ludd
2005-11-27 21:01 ` Ivan Yosifov
2005-11-27 22:24 ` Ned Ludd
2005-11-28 11:00 ` Paul de Vrieze
2005-11-27 18:03 ` Mark Loeser
2005-11-27 19:51 ` Olivier Crête
2005-11-26 19:22 ` [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult " Ivan Yosifov
2005-11-26 20:01 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-11-26 21:42 ` Petteri Räty
2005-11-27 0:48 ` Dan Meltzer
2005-11-27 0:53 ` Mart Raudsepp
2005-11-27 12:23 ` Ned Ludd [this message]
2005-11-26 23:10 ` Luca Barbato
2005-11-27 12:54 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-11-27 14:39 ` Dan Meltzer
2005-11-27 14:49 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-11-27 14:50 ` Ned Ludd
2005-11-27 15:31 ` Edward Catmur
2005-11-28 1:18 ` Georgi Georgiev
2005-11-28 4:21 ` Edward Catmur
2005-11-27 15:04 ` Tavis Ormandy
2005-11-27 15:30 ` Dan Meltzer
2005-11-28 11:14 ` Paul de Vrieze
2005-11-27 22:35 ` Spider (D.m.D. Lj.)
2005-11-28 10:51 ` Paul de Vrieze
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1133094231.5422.354.camel@localhost \
--to=solar@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox