On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 20:57 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > Nope, not missing anything. Thought I said it, compability isn't a
> > reason to hold this up anymore, only asking if people want multi-hashes
> > now at the expense of a bigger tree when Manifest2 comes along.
> 
> I'm referring to portage-2.0.50 and below. What exactly needs to be done by 
> those few that are still using it to upgrade to a better portage after it 
> dies on finding SHA1 sums in portage's digest?

They would need to redigest portage/sandbox with their version of
portage, as you said.  They would need to create a symlink
from /etc/make.profile to /usr/portage/profiles/obsolete/$arch, then
they would need to emerge --oneshot sandbox portage.  After that, they
can upgrade to a supported profile.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
x86 Architecture Team
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux