From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Multi hash support in portage - status
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:01:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1132840919.19957.6.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200511242057.07443.jstubbs@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 913 bytes --]
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 20:57 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > Nope, not missing anything. Thought I said it, compability isn't a
> > reason to hold this up anymore, only asking if people want multi-hashes
> > now at the expense of a bigger tree when Manifest2 comes along.
>
> I'm referring to portage-2.0.50 and below. What exactly needs to be done by
> those few that are still using it to upgrade to a better portage after it
> dies on finding SHA1 sums in portage's digest?
They would need to redigest portage/sandbox with their version of
portage, as you said. They would need to create a symlink
from /etc/make.profile to /usr/portage/profiles/obsolete/$arch, then
they would need to emerge --oneshot sandbox portage. After that, they
can upgrade to a supported profile.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
x86 Architecture Team
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-24 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-24 0:04 [gentoo-dev] Multi hash support in portage - status Marius Mauch
2005-11-24 0:32 ` Marius Mauch
2005-11-24 0:49 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-11-24 1:07 ` Marius Mauch
2005-11-24 11:57 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-11-24 14:01 ` Chris Gianelloni [this message]
2005-11-24 6:33 ` Marc Hildebrand
2005-11-24 10:38 ` Marius Mauch
2005-11-24 13:56 ` Grant Goodyear
2005-11-24 13:58 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-26 2:12 ` Marius Mauch
2005-11-26 3:11 ` Jason Stubbs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1132840919.19957.6.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org \
--to=wolf31o2@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox