From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EfHlK-0001sw-PO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:07:47 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAOE5UxK028411; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:05:30 GMT Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org (66-191-187-123.dhcp.gnvl.sc.charter.com [66.191.187.123]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAODxCgi019306 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:59:12 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434F924801F for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 08:49:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gravity.twi-31o2.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18351-01 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 08:49:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from vertigo.twi-31o2.org (vertigo.twi-31o2.org [192.168.0.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF5224801E for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 08:49:22 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Multi hash support in portage - status From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20051124113844.7d358592@sven.genone.homeip.net> References: <20051124010432.33eecead@sven.genone.homeip.net> <43855EBE.2000507@gentoo.org> <20051124113844.7d358592@sven.genone.homeip.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-KCvZkt04/YBmCrR5mxCE" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 08:58:23 -0500 Message-Id: <1132840703.19957.2.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at twi-31o2.org X-Archives-Salt: 1a6aacdb-e024-46b9-aca4-69d0425bd28d X-Archives-Hash: 56c00a0d3e90179c50c88e8971849a7f --=-KCvZkt04/YBmCrR5mxCE Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 11:38 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: > > I'd rather wait for Manifest2 support. > > What is the ETA for the GLEP and the implementation after i? >=20 > GLEP I still have to start writing (mostly a reformatting of a mail I > sent a long time ago), there is already a prototype implementation > (doesn't cover everything yet but works generally), target is > for when current trunk will be released (still have to settle on a > version for it), which should hopefully be after 2.0.54 gets out > (which should be in the next few weeks). At a guess I'd say 4 months > till stable (but really, that's just a guess, see the 2.1 fiasko). I think I would rather see the multi-hash support now, rather than later, as it seems to be something our users are asking about and it seems like all the work is really there for an implementation sooner rather than later. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-KCvZkt04/YBmCrR5mxCE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDhcb/kT4lNIS36YERAvsTAJ4vY85uPCHUk+7k/uLKj4XmXBqI8QCdH8BO myBquIUIU5mS1Ttaj5Ksj2M= =ty/a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-KCvZkt04/YBmCrR5mxCE-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list