From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ee0Q3-00017b-54 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 01:24:31 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAL1NmfB018306; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 01:23:48 GMT Received: from skinny.southernlinux.net (ns2.rednecks.net [64.192.52.5]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAL1M2bf027499 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 01:22:02 GMT Received: (qmail 4101 invoked by uid 210); 20 Nov 2005 20:15:23 -0500 Received: from 64.192.53.59 by skinny (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.82/1179. f-prot: 4.4.2/3.14.11. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(64.192.53.59):. Processed in 0.057646 secs); 21 Nov 2005 01:15:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO montgomery-59.epproach.net) (64.192.53.59) by 0 with SMTP; 20 Nov 2005 20:15:23 -0500 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Distcc and SLP - request for testing From: Ned Ludd To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <4380FC95.4030003@gentoo.org> References: <1132507911.17028.27.camel@localhost> <4380D0A0.1090302@gentoo.org> <1132516791.17028.29.camel@localhost> <4380FC95.4030003@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 20:21:59 -0500 Message-Id: <1132536119.4569.57.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 1b0ec867-85f6-4245-9190-559bd2a7ad30 X-Archives-Hash: 2707f077e87fedc2d83ba7bb002aa72f On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 14:45 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Lisa Seelye wrote: > | On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 11:38 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > |>Out of curiosity, why isn't this patch just being sent upstream for > |>incorporation there? > | > | > | It is, but there hasn't been much work on Distcc this year. > > Our policy for X is that if upstream won't accept it, we won't either. > Perhaps you'd be interested in adopting that and convincing the reported > to get upstream interested? Your policy for X is somewhat questionable Donnie as it puts us in a catch 22. You wont accept patches unless they came from upstream and upstream wants some testing or to put it off till a later date..It's a continuing heartache dealing with X when something could of been fixed months ago. -- Ned Ludd Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list