From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdqbV-0005Ag-UJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 14:55:42 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAKEsFsW000268; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 14:54:15 GMT Received: from mail.gnqs.org (myrddraal.demon.co.uk [62.49.28.63]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAKEns3s016277 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 14:49:54 GMT Received: from mogheiden.gnqs.org ([192.168.0.20]) by mail.gnqs.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EdqVr-00067Z-4Z for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 14:49:54 +0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] webapp-config v1.50 added to the tree - testers wanted From: Stuart Herbert To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1132496289.15007.44.camel@localhost> References: <1132493721.8602.25.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <1132496289.15007.44.camel@localhost> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-IbJR4WSyJcNEPifM35/L" Organization: Gentoo Linux Project Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 14:49:41 +0000 Message-Id: <1132498182.8602.28.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "demandred.gnqs.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 09:18 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote: > Sorry I cant help it. But is this some sort of joke? > Using the words 'portage' and 'fast' in the same sentence > somehow seems like an oxymoron. portage is _powerful_ > but it's anything but fast. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 7.5 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.8 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts X-Archives-Salt: ef6436c1-9115-4ecb-990c-04bc8d106ce1 X-Archives-Hash: 6a0319906f9c54110b0a041beb60c6b4 --=-IbJR4WSyJcNEPifM35/L Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 09:18 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote: > Sorry I cant help it. But is this some sort of joke? > Using the words 'portage' and 'fast' in the same sentence=20 > somehow seems like an oxymoron. portage is _powerful_=20 > but it's anything but fast. No, but it *is* a benchmark that everyone can relate to. And it's magnitudes faster than my original bash version of webapp-config ;-) Best regards, Stu --=20 Stuart Herbert stuart@gentoo.org Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/ GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint =3D 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C -- --=-IbJR4WSyJcNEPifM35/L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDgI0FDC+AuvmvxXwRAuHWAKCpajvHbkA6V9e30bd1ccPRtElyqgCfSnHC MwLeWbjbEEDvHtSFjDtTRkU= =5YUX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-IbJR4WSyJcNEPifM35/L-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list