From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Edh0y-0004Mj-4Z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 04:41:20 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAK4e7HY029456; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 04:40:07 GMT Received: from skinny.southernlinux.net (ns2.rednecks.net [64.192.52.5]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAK4bC6O013841 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 04:37:13 GMT Received: (qmail 7077 invoked by uid 210); 19 Nov 2005 23:30:36 -0500 Received: from 64.192.53.59 by skinny (envelope-from <solar@gentoo.org>, uid 201) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.82/1179. f-prot: 4.4.2/3.14.11. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(64.192.53.59):. Processed in 0.057894 secs); 20 Nov 2005 04:30:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO montgomery-59.epproach.net) (64.192.53.59) by 0 with SMTP; 19 Nov 2005 23:30:36 -0500 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] implementation details for GLEP 41 From: Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20051120042549.GJ12958@dst.grantgoodyear.org> References: <20051119170615.GW12982@mail.lieber.org> <20051119224241.GC12982@mail.lieber.org> <20051120042549.GJ12958@dst.grantgoodyear.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:37:11 -0500 Message-Id: <1132461431.11765.33.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 4e0bb46a-859f-4783-994d-e8a5c8d575b5 X-Archives-Hash: 0bdfe8099523d079cd44ec736853d870 On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 22:25 -0600, Grant Goodyear wrote: > Kurt Lieber wrote: [Sat Nov 19 2005, 04:42:41PM CST] > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 05:06:15PM +0000 or thereabouts, Kurt Lieber wrote: > > If the requirement is for r/o CVS access to the same CVS server that the > > pure-blooded developers use (sorry, couldn't resist) then it may require > > upgrades to our existing server and/or purchasing a new server. > > What about authenticated viewcvs on the live CVS server instead? Back > when we had a live viewcvs I used to use it all the time for doing > exactly what the ATs want to do now, and I assume that viewcvs puts much > less load on the server than a CVS pull does. > > In any event, do we need a new server anyway? We actually do have some > money that could be spent on such things, and the CVS server is really > high on the list of for which I, personally, would be more than willing > to spend it. > > -g2boojum- If we were able to purchase hardware then we might as well make it the anon cvs/svn server, no keys/auth are needed then and simple aliases would suffice on toucan maintained by the AT leads. -- Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org> Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list