Re: [gentoo-dev] implementation details for GLEP 41

[Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org>]

On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 22:25 -0600, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Kurt Lieber wrote: [Sat Nov 19 2005, 04:42:41PM CST]
> > On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 05:06:15PM +0000 or thereabouts, Kurt Lieber wrote:
> > If the requirement is for r/o CVS access to the same CVS server that the
> > pure-blooded developers use (sorry, couldn't resist) then it may require
> > upgrades to our existing server and/or purchasing a new server.  
> 
> What about authenticated viewcvs on the live CVS server instead?  Back
> when we had a live viewcvs I used to use it all the time for doing
> exactly what the ATs want to do now, and I assume that viewcvs puts much
> less load on the server than a CVS pull does.  
> 
> In any event, do we need a new server anyway?  We actually do have some
> money that could be spent on such things, and the CVS server is really
> high on the list of for which I, personally, would be more than willing
> to spend it.
> 
> -g2boojum-

If we were able to purchase hardware then we might as well make it the
anon cvs/svn server, no keys/auth are needed then and simple aliases
would suffice on toucan maintained by the AT leads.


-- 
Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list