From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdcTm-0005KT-CP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:50:46 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAJNmuSm023431; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:48:56 GMT Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.205]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAJNie4x000127 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:44:41 GMT Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z3so433961nzf for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:44:40 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=rzOSiRCY88Ot8j3gAYjcdfPOqxnnJZxyAF/xJ1uy6lSbEUj+Ui/t8GI1sQDTZLLfxXIavvQWGwrRT1VcMwpsYtXFz4iRNrD3NMa6KwcVXMl8M1g04bMp/9BELcTV6AP2h+VZa9nayY669awsFFRjupyOXUaOXx+bzefealNBKF4= Received: by 10.36.80.14 with SMTP id d14mr1345946nzb; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:44:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?176.16.10.26? ( [68.144.157.61]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 37sm161232nzf.2005.11.19.15.44.39; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:44:40 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] implementation details for GLEP 41 From: Lares Moreau To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20051119225650.GE12982@mail.lieber.org> References: <20051119170615.GW12982@mail.lieber.org> <20051119224241.GC12982@mail.lieber.org> <46059ce10511191444u26638588qbba94f158c19327e@mail.gmail.com> <20051119225650.GE12982@mail.lieber.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-9Hz81aD+DWGBjzlFtKwI" Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:44:38 -0700 Message-Id: <1132443878.6892.57.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 X-Archives-Salt: b9a15c84-15cf-4ceb-8ded-5df2246a3e23 X-Archives-Hash: 51566645f0579793133ff273b19b927b --=-9Hz81aD+DWGBjzlFtKwI Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 22:56 +0000, Kurt Lieber wrote: > So, can other arch testers please pitch in with their $.02? If we gave y= ou > rsync instead of CVS, would that be sufficient? Or do you need the > revision history, etc. of CVS? >=20 > And, any objections to a ~30 minute delay between CVS<->this solution? >=20 > --kurt I personally do not need Revision histories, I can't speak for other ATs. Rsync with 30min delay is a noted improvement over the standard rsync policy. Does this also allow us to sync to main rotation mirroes is that already overstressed? I ask because IIRC it may take ~30min for all the mirrors to sync up to the 'Latest' revision, therefore the sync that I do _may_ be up to 60min old (worstcase). so main rotation mirror access would be nice. Feasable? I know not. Later Days --=20 Lares Moreau | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org Gentoo x86 Arch Tester | ::0 Alberta, Canada Public Key: 0D46BB6E @ subkeys.pgp.net | Encrypted Mail Prefered Key fingerprint =3D 0CA3 E40D F897 7709 3628 C5D4 7D94 483E 0D46 BB6E --=-9Hz81aD+DWGBjzlFtKwI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDf7jlfZRIPg1Gu24RAuyiAKCJ19o7rLEz2n6jr1aLQOoIyyIRigCgijQ8 PBhH5hrHI9MX+OhZG9qBjOw= =vYkG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-9Hz81aD+DWGBjzlFtKwI-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list