From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdG38-0003B3-Gj for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 23:53:46 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAINqeKf018952; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 23:52:40 GMT Received: from mail.gnqs.org (myrddraal.demon.co.uk [62.49.28.63]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAINlmGE009429 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 23:47:48 GMT Received: from mogheiden.gnqs.org ([192.168.0.20]) by mail.gnqs.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EdFxJ-00023K-FT for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 23:47:48 +0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain From: Stuart Herbert To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20051118232924.GK12982@mail.lieber.org> References: <1132333748.8524.9.camel@localhost> <20051118173243.GA16034@dmz.brixandersen.dk> <437E4F3E.5070705@gentoo.org> <20051118221428.15ba3adb@snowdrop.home> <437E5965.10502@gentoo.org> <20051118232924.GK12982@mail.lieber.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-x0H7gXLJM3XdJHbt5n2y" Organization: Gentoo Linux Project Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 23:47:23 +0000 Message-Id: <1132357643.8558.60.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "demandred.gnqs.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 23:29 +0000, Kurt Lieber wrote: > There is no technical reason why any of this is necessary and it doesn't > provide any tangible benefits that I can see. If a user really wants to > know someone's role within the project, they can go look it up on the web > site. > > --kurt [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 7.5 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.8 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts X-Archives-Salt: acfd024e-3214-447c-81d6-6506021154bf X-Archives-Hash: 4a4ad1786cf722b65906c24a040d0acb --=-x0H7gXLJM3XdJHbt5n2y Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 23:29 +0000, Kurt Lieber wrote: > There is no technical reason why any of this is necessary and it doesn't > provide any tangible benefits that I can see. If a user really wants to > know someone's role within the project, they can go look it up on the web > site. >=20 > --kurt +1 also. Best regards, Stu --=20 Stuart Herbert stuart@gentoo.org Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/ GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint =3D 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C -- --=-x0H7gXLJM3XdJHbt5n2y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDfmgLDC+AuvmvxXwRAuofAJ46EA+ulWPhfryl13FINeBpQWzj0gCggNn2 1bvxhrMMRSXileDtYupLPl0= =SY7u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-x0H7gXLJM3XdJHbt5n2y-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list