From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EaLdl-0000od-2k for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:15:33 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAANEm2L026710; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:14:48 GMT Received: from mail.gnqs.org (myrddraal.demon.co.uk [62.49.28.63]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAAND46V018595 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:13:04 GMT Received: from mogheiden.gnqs.org ([192.168.0.20]) by mail.gnqs.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EaLbK-0005N1-IP; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:13:03 +0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two From: Stuart Herbert To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: glep@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20051105005814.0de0d8ff@snowdrop.home> References: <20051105005814.0de0d8ff@snowdrop.home> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-5RJvSxsUjfZfIEyHLDjC" Organization: Gentoo Linux Project Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 23:12:28 +0000 Message-Id: <1131664348.8511.95.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "demandred.gnqs.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 00:58 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Feedback from people who have something useful to say would be very much > welcomed, assuming of course that they've read the GLEP. Apologies if this has already been picked up by someone else in this monster thread ;-) [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 7.5 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.8 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts X-Archives-Salt: e1c7c886-0d7b-4594-9784-b342e37dc51d X-Archives-Hash: 0b4198d6dffa8a92777056f1485be2cf --=-5RJvSxsUjfZfIEyHLDjC Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 00:58 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Feedback from people who have something useful to say would be very much > welcomed, assuming of course that they've read the GLEP. Apologies if this has already been picked up by someone else in this monster thread ;-) Should the GLEP explain how Portage will know how many unread news items there are in /var/lib/gentoo/news? I couldn't spot where this is covered in the text, or in the example code. Best regards, Stu --=20 Stuart Herbert stuart@gentoo.org Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/ GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint =3D 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C -- --=-5RJvSxsUjfZfIEyHLDjC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDc9PcDC+AuvmvxXwRAtKmAJ49VURMiDIHC7bIVa8T45L12i2hXQCdH6kn cWCNmJJ4xvee6EDlXgXsdhA= =e1ZS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-5RJvSxsUjfZfIEyHLDjC-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list