From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EaL8d-0002DG-0m for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 22:43:23 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAAMgdLt008696; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 22:42:39 GMT Received: from mail.gnqs.org (myrddraal.demon.co.uk [62.49.28.63]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAAMepN4011307 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 22:40:51 GMT Received: from mogheiden.gnqs.org ([192.168.0.20]) by mail.gnqs.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EaL69-0005EE-5g for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 22:40:51 +0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo Council meeting Tuesday, November 15th, 20:00 UTC From: Stuart Herbert To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: References: <4370D28A.5080607@gentoo.org> <1131483009.8401.31.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <4371BD2F.7090704@gentoo.org> <1131658817.8511.70.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-M8AZXo6IxgNN/ET7CHY3" Organization: Gentoo Linux Project Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 22:40:02 +0000 Message-Id: <1131662402.8511.83.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "demandred.gnqs.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 15:18 -0700, Duncan wrote: > Well. given that there's been only one Council meeting, so far, and the > rules are sort of being made as points come up that need addressed, Hrm. According to [1], there has been two meetings so far. There are no agendas for these meetings on that page tho :( [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 7.5 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.8 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts X-Archives-Salt: e2c7201e-1160-47f9-838e-3f4615b22a03 X-Archives-Hash: 998da70206ecae648f8e7ba0e99f33e7 --=-M8AZXo6IxgNN/ET7CHY3 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 15:18 -0700, Duncan wrote: > Well. given that there's been only one Council meeting, so far, and the > rules are sort of being made as points come up that need addressed,=20 Hrm. According to [1], there has been two meetings so far. There are no agendas for these meetings on that page tho :( > I believe a reliable practice is the target, but with only one meeting, > there simply hasn't been enough "practice" yet to determine "reliable". = =3D8^) That's why I'm asking ;-) [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/index.xml Best regards, Stu --=20 Stuart Herbert stuart@gentoo.org Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/ GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint =3D 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C -- --=-M8AZXo6IxgNN/ET7CHY3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDc8xCDC+AuvmvxXwRAn+JAKC47EqdCE12NDG7QV0gXNh7fAE5nwCfZfO5 VcwfBuGCK+v4TW1I6iPbnxM= =udUj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-M8AZXo6IxgNN/ET7CHY3-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list