From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EaKD7-0006tU-Qa for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:43:58 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAALhF4B006748; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:43:15 GMT Received: from mail.gnqs.org (myrddraal.demon.co.uk [62.49.28.63]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAALfSYV015532 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:41:28 GMT Received: from mogheiden.gnqs.org ([192.168.0.20]) by mail.gnqs.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EaKAh-00021p-Ex for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:41:28 +0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council meeting Tuesday, November 15th, 20:00 UTC From: Stuart Herbert To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <4371BD2F.7090704@gentoo.org> References: <4370D28A.5080607@gentoo.org> <1131483009.8401.31.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <4371BD2F.7090704@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-UYxGWn0lPif69wE9hZjC" Organization: Gentoo Linux Project Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:40:17 +0000 Message-Id: <1131658817.8511.70.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "demandred.gnqs.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 10:11 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: > The agenda is generally posted by the chairman after the deadline, on > both gentoo-council and gentoo-dev. Would it be possible to establish a reliable practice on this? I think "Generally" means "sometimes, but not always". Could we have "always" please instead? [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 7.5 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.8 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts X-Archives-Salt: 2538978a-591f-42bf-be5c-5e8aa994c520 X-Archives-Hash: 9dfd4172a7542d162be5831a0c89d9fb --=-UYxGWn0lPif69wE9hZjC Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 10:11 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: > The agenda is generally posted by the chairman after the deadline, on > both gentoo-council and gentoo-dev. Would it be possible to establish a reliable practice on this? I think "Generally" means "sometimes, but not always". Could we have "always" please instead? Would it be possible to ensure that the agenda is posted a guaranteed minimum period of time in advance? There are large parts of the day when it's not possible for me to check my Gentoo email. I think it would be reasonable to post the agenda no less than 24 hours in advance of each meeting. Many thanks, Stu --=20 Stuart Herbert stuart@gentoo.org Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/ GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint =3D 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C -- --=-UYxGWn0lPif69wE9hZjC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDc75BDC+AuvmvxXwRAlJ4AJ0VR7PI/1xo3tMApK0bT2v1KVqLVwCgs/Mi oiJHhJWTIz78lKrVotdGi+4= =LCB7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-UYxGWn0lPif69wE9hZjC-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list