From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EYSwI-0003Jl-Sg for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 18:38:55 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jA5IcCaQ003974; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 18:38:12 GMT Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org (66-191-187-123.dhcp.gnvl.sc.charter.com [66.191.187.123]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jA5IaRuG018090 for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 18:36:28 GMT Received: from vertigo.twi-31o2.org (vertigo.twi-31o2.org [192.168.0.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EB90248020 for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 13:27:02 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] useful profiles.desc From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <436CC04C.5060401@gentoo.org> References: <436CC04C.5060401@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-dD0JSl++PRnxZZjGTGLI" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 13:34:55 -0500 Message-Id: <1131215695.27346.25.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 X-Archives-Salt: 31f01df1-8997-44e0-b7a7-9b13b7a212ae X-Archives-Hash: 48cdf6808207ea8d55a7405d0edd4cd6 --=-dD0JSl++PRnxZZjGTGLI Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 09:23 -0500, Aaron Walker wrote: > Continuing a subject I've brought up several times in the past... >=20 > Are we any closer to having a profiles.desc that lists all valid profiles= ? > IIRC the current stable portage should be ok with it. Are there any othe= r > issues preventing this from becoming a reality? There should be no issues anymore. I was planning on doing this myself at some point. Are you wanting to do this, or should I? Also, what are the valid "status" entries? Is it just dev and stable? --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-dD0JSl++PRnxZZjGTGLI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDbPtPkT4lNIS36YERAn6jAKCHNYuVKw1XHc/Yx0+TQPat2BCQJQCgg07U bhvwNiMzh3BYo+VGwFwaeCs= =E5+x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-dD0JSl++PRnxZZjGTGLI-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list