On Thu, 2005-27-10 at 09:36 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Thursday 27 October 2005 02:15, Luca Barbato wrote:
> > Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > > In the case of embedded it is clear that what in binary distributions
> > > is part of the development package (.la files, static libraries,
> > > header files) is not desired at all. To break dependencies to only
> > > strip away some of the headers seems to me a half solution that
> > > breaks a lot and doesn't solve the problem either.
> >
> > Btw embedded has already different way to archive the same result (ok,
> > removing headers and static libs after isn't really the cleanest
> > solution but works fine)
> 
> The hardest part is probably to build all these packages as the finals 
> shouldn't have headers while the intermediates (used to build other 
> finals against) should.

Again, why not leave everything in the packages and use INSTALL_MASK on
embedded systems ?

-- 
Olivier Crête
tester@gentoo.org
x86 Security Liaison