From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ET9vj-0001oZ-Fu for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 03:20:23 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9M3G5pL011496; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 03:16:05 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9M3Afl7001295 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 03:10:42 GMT Received: from biscayne-one-station.mit.edu ([18.7.7.80]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ET9p6-0004Rv-FC for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 03:13:32 +0000 Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103]) by biscayne-one-station.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id j9M3DVow029453; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 23:13:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from NETTEON.MIT.EDU (NETTEON.MIT.EDU [18.244.3.50]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as mlodutb@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.1/8.12.4) with ESMTP id j9M3DPxo001213 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 21 Oct 2005 23:13:25 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [gentoo-dev] rm `which gcc` && emerge -e world From: Tomasz Mloduchowski To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-fsqpQXCIBhR4YG0stgxs" Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 23:12:33 -0400 Message-Id: <1129950753.4942.15.camel@TSUNAMI.MIT.EDU> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 X-Spam-Score: 1.217 X-Spam-Level: * (1.217) X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42 X-Archives-Salt: 2444fee3-f2f6-41b6-b3a2-b63810766972 X-Archives-Hash: bbd9254ca6e412dece4c1569a94dd843 --=-fsqpQXCIBhR4YG0stgxs Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Now, that I've got your attention. IMHO above should NOT fail - most of the software in portage is already using ${HOST}-gcc instead and gcc symlink is just a convenience. But it does. In packages I will never suspect being nasty (qt, lynx) and ones I would, but they shouldn't (fuse) What is so important in that feature? Crosscompilation and distcc.=20 For example, I have alpha-unknown-linux-gnu running as a distcc server for x86 box. And, it does not work for those packages. I got sick of filling 3 almost identical bug reports=20 110040, 110086 and 110087 and I'm not even at half of emerge -uD world. So, if you agree that it IS a problem, do the `rm` and run ebuilds you maintain. You will save me another 10 or so unnended bugreports. Tomasz --=-fsqpQXCIBhR4YG0stgxs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDWa4h4G4ecAEwAR0RAhOVAKCa3yIBbbXfAjRNupclcxqT3l/mfQCcCdyJ hJqnYqg/MO9qO3EL46yTwLo= =EezW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-fsqpQXCIBhR4YG0stgxs-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list