From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ESmlT-0004Yc-8E for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 02:36:15 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9L2XPB4012360; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 02:33:25 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9L2Viq9023469 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 02:31:44 GMT Received: from c83-251-213-182.bredband.comhem.se ([83.251.213.182]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1ESmjg-0007b3-AK for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 02:34:24 +0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ${PORTDIR}/profiles/package.use From: "Spider (D.m.D. Lj.)" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200510202226.58360.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <43581061.5090102@gentoo.org> <200510202216.54195.vapier@gentoo.org> <36596.127.0.0.1.1129861153.squirrel@cornholio> <200510202226.58360.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-lyONk7cIoBU8uQ2fq+jR" Organization: Gentoo Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 04:34:22 +0200 Message-Id: <1129862062.1653.1.camel@Darkmere.darkmere> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 X-Archives-Salt: 872e9601-a082-4cd0-ab17-613afe74228d X-Archives-Hash: fd1cac648a2b270d88e278e729c390ef --=-lyONk7cIoBU8uQ2fq+jR Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 22:26 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 20 October 2005 10:19 pm, Dave Nebinger wrote: > > >> > i still dont see how this addresses the nocxx / USE=3D-* > > >> > > >> noFOO is used because "FOO" is on by default, and noFOO turns it off= . > > >> AutoUSE is the same way, package bar is included in the buildplan an= d to > > >> have sane defaults, certain flags are turned on. > > > > > > that was a great explanation however irrelevant it may have been > > > > > > i guess we will have to make 'nocxx' a special case as we strip all o= ther > > > 'no*' USE flags from portage > > > > Sorry, guys, but isn't that what "-FOO" is supposed to be for? If we > > already have support for "-FOO", why then do we need a "noFOO" also? > > > > Or is there some distinction I'm missing here? >=20 > you're missing the fact that if we change 'nocxx' to 'cxx' then everyone = who=20 > uses '-*' in their USE flags will emerge their gcc without C++ support > -mike Yes. And that is as intended with -*. Really, Don't refuse an idea because this. Having IUSE=3D"cxx" USE=3D"-*" and getting -cxx is expected behaviour. =20 Not having a C++ compiler might be just exactly what they want, right? :) //Spider --=20 begin .signature Tortured users / Laughing in pain See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. end --=-lyONk7cIoBU8uQ2fq+jR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDWFOuZS9CZTi033kRAqqoAJ9epD36K1HiGBj1ZKiQVICH12moUgCeIIkQ SLGfcDTS3aq1IgLkNTaiiTI= =Xzrh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-lyONk7cIoBU8uQ2fq+jR-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list