From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1ERcO9-0007HA-LT
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 21:19:22 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9HLGOJq008388;
	Mon, 17 Oct 2005 21:16:24 GMT
Received: from smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9HLCuJ4019507
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 21:12:56 GMT
Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4])
	by smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j9HLF0S8030118
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:15:00 -0400
Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:14:59 -0400
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] browserplugin vs. nsplugin
From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <43540EF5.8010105@gentoo.org>
References: <200507131158.14125.mail@hboeck.de>
	 <43540EF5.8010105@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-AwYzdt3Kto5XZasNwEYr"
Organization: Gentoo Linux
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:14:58 -0400
Message-Id: <1129583699.8881.193.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 
X-Archives-Salt: b3c67dcc-b1aa-401b-80f7-d1606f762973
X-Archives-Hash: 8f90a84f9b26ec792bb0aeb7befc8c63


--=-AwYzdt3Kto5XZasNwEYr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 22:52 +0200, dju` wrote:
> Hanno B=C3=B6ck wrote:
> > Before this discussion sleeps, what should be the conclusion?
> > For now, the situation in the tree is :
> > - java-stuff uses browserplugin
> > - acroread uses noplugin
> > - helixplayer/realplayer/vlc/gxine/djvu use nsplugin
>=20
> Probably a silly question, but why choose nsplugin over browserplugin?=20
> Aren't there any package that might provide plugins for=20
> non-netscape-based browsers?

Actually, I think it is plugin-compatible with netscape, not necessarily
netscape-based.  For example, Konquerer can use the same plugins.  At
any rate, it is probably best to think about this now, hence using
nsplugin, rather than later, when whiz-bang $browser comes out that has
its own plugin interface.

--=20
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
x86 Architecture Team
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

--=-AwYzdt3Kto5XZasNwEYr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDVBRSkT4lNIS36YERArzNAJ9JrdCqHhtD0vEjV+zzfgj2EM1ckgCeIJF3
TJt8vI9FsYM3pK/Z85BmBSE=
=J1JA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-AwYzdt3Kto5XZasNwEYr--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list