From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Possible virtual/alsa change
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 14:25:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1129573517.8881.183.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 808 bytes --]
While discussing a couple issues I was having with automated tinderbox
testing of gnome/kde on x86, it was decided that now might be a good
time to visit the default virtual for alsa. Basically, the Gentoo Linux
ALSA Guide[1] recommends using the in-kernel ALSA. We are also using
2.6 kernels as the default on almost all architectures. The idea is
pretty simple. Change virtual/alsa to match virtual/kernel-sources in
base/virtuals, and change virtual/alsa to alsa-driver on architectures
still using a 2.4 kernel.
So should we do this?
I think it would be a wise move, as I've seen more and more issues with
alsa-driver being pulled in when people don't want/need it.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
x86 Architecture Team
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2005-10-17 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-17 18:25 Chris Gianelloni [this message]
2005-10-17 18:42 ` [gentoo-dev] Possible virtual/alsa change Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-10-17 19:08 ` Jan Kundrát
2005-10-24 10:50 ` Shyam Mani
2005-10-24 13:11 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-24 13:18 ` [gentoo-core] " Stephen P. Becker
2005-10-24 13:30 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-24 13:56 ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-10-24 14:54 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-24 15:03 ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-10-24 15:21 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-24 19:41 ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-10-24 19:25 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-10-25 2:22 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-10-27 18:13 ` John Mylchreest
2005-10-27 18:28 ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-10-27 18:37 ` John Mylchreest
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1129573517.8881.183.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net \
--to=wolf31o2@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox