From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EPRU1-0005Hm-IW for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:16:26 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9BL5vok025853; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:05:57 GMT Received: from smtp05.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9BL2s9v030019 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:02:55 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp05.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j9BLEe6Q005101 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 17:14:40 -0400 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 11 Oct 2005 17:10:29 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting Thursday October 13th From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20051011155449.GC8339@gentoo.org> References: <434A5FA9.206@gentoo.org> <1128949257.8881.54.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20051011155449.GC8339@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-p5OSDt5yQpI0+hEEh/jU" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 17:10:28 -0400 Message-Id: <1129065028.8881.99.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 X-Archives-Salt: 333cf255-ffa7-402c-bebd-01990a2324bf X-Archives-Hash: eef08648fae703667062e71181ab552e --=-p5OSDt5yQpI0+hEEh/jU Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 17:54 +0200, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > That gave me a good laugh. Oh well, anyway. What's "default"? As in > "recommended by the documentation"? Or "installed as dependency of > virtual/logger"? The documentation recommends syslog-ng, as that was requested by Release Engineering for 2005.0's release. As for virtual/logger, it installs metalog. I think the point is that they should match. It was also quite obvious after the comments on the thread, that this is one of those things that probably won't ever be solved by consensus. Is this not the exact thing that the Council is there to do, to make decisions that we cannot agree on ourselves? Yes, it is a minor decision. No, it doesn't really matter much. The main thrust of the whole thing is that they should be equal. > If the former: hump the GDP. I already did. You guys changed it to syslog-ng a while back. > If the latter: hump the baselayout team. What does baselayout have to do with this? > If both, try humping one of them at a time. Doing both just makes funny > pictures, but doesn't give much results. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-p5OSDt5yQpI0+hEEh/jU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDTCpDkT4lNIS36YERAmizAKCcs3gnDXyMIXEO6fL4+chKEyfbngCeJ+qg bu7dmXFlX5J0btVDyGrttjk= =mwvl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-p5OSDt5yQpI0+hEEh/jU-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list